2016
DOI: 10.1101/050732
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring interaction partners from protein sequences

Abstract: Specific protein-protein interactions are crucial in the cell, both to ensure the formation and stability of multi-protein complexes, and to enable signal transduction in various pathways. Functional interactions between proteins result in coevolution between the interaction partners. Hence, the sequences of interacting partners are correlated. Here we exploit these correlations to accurately identify which proteins are specific interaction partners from sequence data alone. Our general approach, which employs… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
171
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(128 reference statements)
2
171
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To extend protein-protein interaction prediction to a proteomic level, new algorithms have been devised to systematically identify protein-protein interactions [95,96]. Both studies used TCS as a benchmark case because of their rich sequence information and known interaction pairing.…”
Section: Protein-protein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To extend protein-protein interaction prediction to a proteomic level, new algorithms have been devised to systematically identify protein-protein interactions [95,96]. Both studies used TCS as a benchmark case because of their rich sequence information and known interaction pairing.…”
Section: Protein-protein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best scoring test protein pairs are considered correct and then added to the training set and the process is repeated. This iterative approach is rather robust as it can be done with no training set [95] or without ever recalculating the interaction energy of the training set to throw out outlier matched pairs [96]. These algorithms were extended to subunits of ABC transporters [95] and to members of the tryptophan biosynthesis machinery [96] and they will likely be generally applicable to determine whether two proteins interact, as long as enough sequence information is available.…”
Section: Protein-protein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That condition imposes distinct boundaries for the amount of PPIs amenable of resolution across definitions of the stochastic variables in terms of coupled and uncoupled amino acids. Indeed, the expectation value 15) for the fraction M −1 n of primary sequence matches among native-like MSA models mapped by S in eq. [14] decreases substantially with ω S meaning that ⟨ϵ⟩ S is systematically larger for physicallycoupled amino-acids at various resolutions δ I (Fig.…”
Section: Degeneracy and Error Analysis Of Short And Long-range Correlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those families are believed to have evolved over long time scales under a shared selective pressure that shapes their statistics. For such families, physics-inspired statistical inference methods have helped to predict contacts between amino-acids in the protein [11], define sectors of co-evolving residues [12], or find interaction partners [13]. Deep [14] and non-deep [15] machine learning approaches have also been successfully applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%