Inferring Near-Surface Ozone Production Regimes: Challenges with using Satellite Retrievals over the Contiguous US

Abstract

Surface ozone regulation policies rely heavily on air quality models, such as CAMx, as important guiding tools. Comparison with observations is crucial to validating a model’s ability to represent ozone production chemistry. Identifying factors influencing surface ozone formation is complicated because ozone photochemical production rates are non-linearly dependent on concentrations of precursors such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). We compare ozone production regimes (OPRs) identified from satellite observations and model simulations, as defined by the ratio of column formaldehyde to nitrogen dioxide (FNR, HCHO/NO2). We perform CAMx simulations for June-July-August 2016 over the Contiguous United States (CONUS) and compared these outputs against two OMI NO2and HCHO retrievals. Our analysis spans diurnal and altitudinal variations of OPRs, offering important insights for effective policy formulation. At the time of the OMI overpass (~1:30 PM LT), OPR is NOx-limited over most of the CONUS, as determined from OMI column ratios. Analysis of CAMx column ratios shows similar results. In contrast, more regions are VOC-limited when we constrain our ratio to within the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL). In the morning (~9 AM LT), the CAMx PBL column ratios shift towards VOC-limited regime. We highlight areas of the CONUS for which satellite measurements of FNR may not be an accurate indicator of near-surface OPRs. Air quality regulations based on satellite observations should consider the diurnal variations of surface OPRs and assess how well their ratios represent near-surface OPR. Our results have implications for interpretation of TEMPO data for policy relevant applications.