Inferring Network Topologies in Infrastructure as a Service Cloud

Battré, Dominic; Frejnik, Natalia; Goel, Siddhant; Kao, Odej; Warneke, Daniel

doi:10.1109/ccgrid.2011.79

“…The provisioning algorithm has two primary phases. The first phase involves the management of existing infrastructure (lines [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. This phase first checks the state of instance requests to identify requests that have been fulfilled and either cancel or repurpose unnecessary requests (e.g., a previously idle job may have been deployed to a newly idle instance).…”

Section: Provisioning Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Analysis of scientific workloads deployed on clouds has highlighted several key challenges, including: limited network performance [19], opaque infrastruc-ture [20], and economic complexity [21]. While the opaque nature of cloud infrastructure is often considered advantageous, it can restrict the ability to exploit data-locality when performing data-intensive workloads.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the Performance of Cloud-based Scientific Services

Chard¹

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>Cloud computing provides access to a large scale set of readily available computing resources at the click of a button. The cloud paradigm has commoditised computing capacity and is often touted as a low-cost model for executing and scaling applications. However, there are significant technical challenges associated with selecting, acquiring, configuring, and managing cloud resources which can restrict the efficient utilisation of cloud capabilities. Scientific computing is increasingly hosted on cloud infrastructure—in which scientific capabilities are delivered to the broad scientific community via Internet-accessible services. This migration from on-premise to on-demand cloud infrastructure is motivated by the sporadic usage patterns of scientific workloads and the associated potential cost savings without the need to purchase, operate, and manage compute infrastructure—a task that few scientific users are trained to perform. However, cloud platforms are not an automatic solution. Their flexibility is derived from an enormous number of services and configuration options, which in turn result in significant complexity for the user. In fact, naïve cloud usage can result in poor performance and excessive costs, which are then directly passed on to researchers. This thesis presents methods for developing efficient cloud-based scientific services. Three real-world scientific services are analysed and a set of common requirements are derived. To address these requirements, this thesis explores automated and scalable methods for inferring network performance, considers various trade-offs (e.g., cost and performance) when provisioning instances, and profiles application performance, all in heterogeneous and dynamic cloud environments. Specifically, network tomography provides the mechanisms to infer network performance in dynamic and opaque cloud networks; cost-aware automated provisioning approaches enable services to consider, in real-time, various trade-offs such as cost, performance, and reliability; and automated application profiling allows a huge search space of applications, instance types, and configurations to be analysed to determine resource requirements and application performance. Finally, these contributions are integrated into an extensible and modular cloud provisioning and resource management service called SCRIMP. Cloud-based scientific applications and services can subscribe to SCRIMP to outsource their provisioning, usage, and management of cloud infrastructures. Collectively, the approaches presented in this thesis are shown to provide order of magnitude cost savings and significant performance improvement when employed by production scientific services.</p>

show abstract

“…The provisioning algorithm has two primary phases. The first phase involves the management of existing infrastructure (lines [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. This phase first checks the state of instance requests to identify requests that have been fulfilled and either cancel or repurpose unnecessary requests (e.g., a previously idle job may have been deployed to a newly idle instance).…”

Section: Provisioning Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Analysis of scientific workloads deployed on clouds has highlighted several key challenges, including: limited network performance [19], opaque infrastruc-ture [20], and economic complexity [21]. While the opaque nature of cloud infrastructure is often considered advantageous, it can restrict the ability to exploit data-locality when performing data-intensive workloads.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving the Performance of Cloud-based Scientific Services

Chard¹

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>Cloud computing provides access to a large scale set of readily available computing resources at the click of a button. The cloud paradigm has commoditised computing capacity and is often touted as a low-cost model for executing and scaling applications. However, there are significant technical challenges associated with selecting, acquiring, configuring, and managing cloud resources which can restrict the efficient utilisation of cloud capabilities. Scientific computing is increasingly hosted on cloud infrastructure—in which scientific capabilities are delivered to the broad scientific community via Internet-accessible services. This migration from on-premise to on-demand cloud infrastructure is motivated by the sporadic usage patterns of scientific workloads and the associated potential cost savings without the need to purchase, operate, and manage compute infrastructure—a task that few scientific users are trained to perform. However, cloud platforms are not an automatic solution. Their flexibility is derived from an enormous number of services and configuration options, which in turn result in significant complexity for the user. In fact, naïve cloud usage can result in poor performance and excessive costs, which are then directly passed on to researchers. This thesis presents methods for developing efficient cloud-based scientific services. Three real-world scientific services are analysed and a set of common requirements are derived. To address these requirements, this thesis explores automated and scalable methods for inferring network performance, considers various trade-offs (e.g., cost and performance) when provisioning instances, and profiles application performance, all in heterogeneous and dynamic cloud environments. Specifically, network tomography provides the mechanisms to infer network performance in dynamic and opaque cloud networks; cost-aware automated provisioning approaches enable services to consider, in real-time, various trade-offs such as cost, performance, and reliability; and automated application profiling allows a huge search space of applications, instance types, and configurations to be analysed to determine resource requirements and application performance. Finally, these contributions are integrated into an extensible and modular cloud provisioning and resource management service called SCRIMP. Cloud-based scientific applications and services can subscribe to SCRIMP to outsource their provisioning, usage, and management of cloud infrastructures. Collectively, the approaches presented in this thesis are shown to provide order of magnitude cost savings and significant performance improvement when employed by production scientific services.</p>

show abstract