Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2783258.2783381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Networks of Substitutable and Complementary Products

Abstract: In a modern recommender system, it is important to understand how products relate to each other. For example, while a user is looking for mobile phones, it might make sense to recommend other phones, but once they buy a phone, we might instead want to recommend batteries, cases, or chargers. These two types of recommendations are referred to as substitutes and complements: substitutes are products that can be purchased instead of each other, while complements are products that can be purchased in addition to e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
329
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 537 publications
(334 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
329
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we use the Amazon [7], [22] and Yelp 4 datasets. Amazon dataset originally contains 142.8 million product reviews ranging from May 1996 to July 2014 and Yelp dataset contains 4.7 million product reviews ranging from July 2004 to January 2017.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use the Amazon [7], [22] and Yelp 4 datasets. Amazon dataset originally contains 142.8 million product reviews ranging from May 1996 to July 2014 and Yelp dataset contains 4.7 million product reviews ranging from July 2004 to January 2017.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four of these datasets are obtained from Amazon [8], [9], three from MovieLens [10], [11], and one from Netflix [12]. These eight datasets used in our experiments (a) contain reliable timestamps (most of the ratings within each dataset have been entered in real rating time and not in a batch mode), (b) are up to date (published between 1998 and 2016), (c) are widely used as benchmarking datasets in CF research and (d) vary with respect to type of dataset (movies, music, videogames and books) and size (from 2MB, up to 4.7GB).…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm, as well as the two algorithms presented in [7], are based on the exploitation of timestamp information which is associated with ratings; hence in this work, we use the Amazon datasets [8], [9], the MovieLens datasets [10], [11] and the Netflix dataset [12], which include the ratings' timestamps. It is worth noting that the proposed algorithm can be combined with other techniques that have been proposed for either improving prediction accuracy in CF-based systems, including consideration of social network data (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] in his Probabilistic polyadic factorization and its application to personalized recommendation demonstrated the effectiveness of directly modelling all the dimensions simultaneously in a unified framework. These among other works presupposes that, tensor decomposition models performed well in terms of prediction efficiency and effectiveness compared to the various matrix factorization algorithms, in particular application to massive data processing [31]- [33]. However, the numerous literature concerning the subject.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%