2019
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201900006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring the Evolutionary History of Your Favorite Protein: A Guide for Molecular Biologists

Abstract: Comparative genomics has proven a fruitful approach to acquire many functional and evolutionary insights into core cellular processes. Here it is argued that in order to perform accurate and interesting comparative genomics, one first and foremost has to be able to recognize, postulate, and revise different evolutionary scenarios. After all, these studies lack a simple protocol, due to different proteins having different evolutionary dynamics and demanding different approaches. The authors here discuss this ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
(118 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used a remote homology detection protocol combining both profile-versus-profile and iterative HMM searches to identify highly divergent orthologues of the metazoan SYCP2:SYCP3 multimers and subunits of the KKT16 complex (figures 2 and 3 ). Specifically, we made use of the ‘hopping’ strategy, which was previously employed to detect divergent homologues of canonical kinetochore proteins [ 8 , 63 , 64 ]. The ‘hopping’ strategy uses the following logic: ‘if A is homologous to B and B is homologous to C, then A must be homologous to C’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used a remote homology detection protocol combining both profile-versus-profile and iterative HMM searches to identify highly divergent orthologues of the metazoan SYCP2:SYCP3 multimers and subunits of the KKT16 complex (figures 2 and 3 ). Specifically, we made use of the ‘hopping’ strategy, which was previously employed to detect divergent homologues of canonical kinetochore proteins [ 8 , 63 , 64 ]. The ‘hopping’ strategy uses the following logic: ‘if A is homologous to B and B is homologous to C, then A must be homologous to C’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible routes to test our hypotheses. One possibility is the construction of phylogenetic trees for the different proteins (domains) that could inform on the order they appeared during evolution of the polarity network (Hooff et al, 2019). Another possibility is to search for species in the current tree of life which contain intermediate steps of the evolutionary trajectory, for instance species with a more ancient version of Bem1 lacking the SH3 domain, and identify the protein self-organization principles underlying polarization in these species.…”
Section: How Evolution Might Leverage Scaffold Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we used a remote homology detection protocol combining both profile-versus-profile and iterative HMM searches to identify highly divergent orthologues of the metazoan SYCP2:SYCP3 multimers and subunits of the KKT16 complex (Figure 2, Figure 3). Specifically, we made use of the 'hopping' strategy which was previously employed to detect divergent homologues of canonical kinetochore proteins [8,61,62].…”
Section: Widespread Conservation Of the Sycp 2-3 Gene Family In Divermentioning
confidence: 99%