2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28604-9_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring the Scope of Negation in Biomedical Documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be roughly categorized into manually crafted rule-based approaches [2,3,5,9] and supervised classification-based [1,6,7,16]. The former looks at lexico-syntactic patterns peculiar to negated expressions so as to spot them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be roughly categorized into manually crafted rule-based approaches [2,3,5,9] and supervised classification-based [1,6,7,16]. The former looks at lexico-syntactic patterns peculiar to negated expressions so as to spot them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm has been utilized [26] for finding encounter-based events in clinical electronic medical records and for classifying them. The idea of using syntactic and semantic processing for determining the scope of negation cues has been tackled in many other research studies [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the main source of error here is the NegatedPredicate-to-BioScopeScopeSpan trans- Table 3: PCS measures from previous BioScope span detection approaches and our end-to-end system. Col. 1-3: end-to-end systems (Morante and Daelemans, 2009), (Ballesteros et al, 2012), and (Velldal et al, 2012);…”
Section: Our Negatedpredicate Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%