2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1786285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring the Value of Intangible Assets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach to this issue differs from that of Arnott et al (2021), Amenc et al (2020), and Li (2020), who attempted to adjust book values for the impact of unaccounted intangible capital, and from that of Angelopoulos et al (2012), who estimated industry-relative intangible intensity for companies in each industry. Although such methods can compensate for biases in valuation metrics that result from inadequate accounting of intangible capital, company-level estimates of intangible capital may be volatile and fraught with measurement error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our approach to this issue differs from that of Arnott et al (2021), Amenc et al (2020), and Li (2020), who attempted to adjust book values for the impact of unaccounted intangible capital, and from that of Angelopoulos et al (2012), who estimated industry-relative intangible intensity for companies in each industry. Although such methods can compensate for biases in valuation metrics that result from inadequate accounting of intangible capital, company-level estimates of intangible capital may be volatile and fraught with measurement error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using SG&A expenses to estimate the stock of organization capital for a sample of US companies, Eisfeldt and Papanikolaou (2013) concluded that companies with a high ratio of organization capital to book assets exhibit higher annual average market returns. Using an industry-relative measure of SG&A expenses, Angelopoulos, Giamouridis, and Vlismas (2012) showed that intangible organization capital is helpful in predicting stock returns for US companies. Comparable results for international companies, however, are sparse.…”
Section: Intangible-intensity Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intellectual capital is broadly classified into three categories (Starovic and Marr, 2004): relational capital, structural capital and human capital. Interactions among these categories are imperative for an organization's competitive advantage (Angelopoulos et al , 2012). Relational capital refers to an organization's ability to develop and maintain relations with the customers and stakeholders who serve long-term mutually beneficial interests (Swart, 2006).…”
Section: Study Background and Hypotheses Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%