1971
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600024461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infertile bulls versus steers: II. Feed conversion efficiency and the effects of a high fat diet

Abstract: SummaryThe feed conversion efficiency of four intensively fed, partially castrated male cattle, measured over an 11-week period from approximately 9-months of age, was found to be significantly higher (P <0·05) than that of four steers.The effect of adding 5% beef tallow to the diet during this period was also studied. Although no statistically significant result of this on feed conversion was obtained, there was an indication that fat in the diet improved the bulls' efficiency, but not that of the steers. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of variance gave no evidence of a sex effect on the difference between the two High plane treatments, for fat deposition, as suggested by Price & Yeates (19716). There was, however, a significant (P < 0-001) effect of feed treatment alone on all the measurements of fat deposition (dressing %, kidney fat %, carcass fat %, offal fat % and fat depths at ' C \ 'Z' and ' J').…”
Section: Body Compositionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Analysis of variance gave no evidence of a sex effect on the difference between the two High plane treatments, for fat deposition, as suggested by Price & Yeates (19716). There was, however, a significant (P < 0-001) effect of feed treatment alone on all the measurements of fat deposition (dressing %, kidney fat %, carcass fat %, offal fat % and fat depths at ' C \ 'Z' and ' J').…”
Section: Body Compositionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Neither of these results was significant, but the small number of cattle involved led Price & Yeates (19716) to speculate that the difference in utilization could be real. The present trial shows no evidence to support this, since the differences that exist could be fully accounted for in terms of a slight inequality in the growth-promoting potential of the two high plane diets, with no apparent sex effect on the difference.…”
Section: Meanmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations