Infertility influencers: an analysis of information and influence in the fertility webspace

Abstract

Purpose To examine fertility-related social media accounts and influencers on two social media platforms. Methods The search function of Twitter (TW) and Instagram (IG) was used to generate a list of accounts with the terms: fertility, infertility, ttc, egg freezing, ivf, endometriosis, and reproductive. Accounts not in English, in private, with no posts in > 1 year, or with content unrelated to search terms were excluded. Accounts were assessed for author type; REI board certification (REI-BC); influencer (INF) status (> 10 K followers on IG; verified check mark on TW); account demographics; and content in last 5 posts. Statistical analysis included unpaired t tests, a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, and stepwise multiple logistic regression.Results Seven hundred ten accounts were identified and 537 (278 TW, 259 IG) were included. Account types included societies, clinics, physicians, patients, groups, and "other." Instagram content (1290 posts reviewed) was primarily personal stories (31.7%) or inspiration/support (23.7%). Twitter content (1390 posts reviewed) was mostly promotion (28.2%) and research/education (20.2%). Thirty-nine accounts (12.5%) were influencers. Fertility influencers were most often awareness/support accounts (59.8% TW, 25.0% IG), patients (12.8% TW, 25% IG), or other (17.9% TW, 21.0% IG). Only 7.7% TW and 7.1% IG INFs were board-certified REI physicians. The best predictor for classification as an influencer was high activity (> 50 posts/month TW, > 10 posts/month IG). Conclusion As patients increasingly utilize social media to obtain and engage with health information, it is critical to understand the fertility-related SM landscape. This understanding may help to successfully enhance relationships with patients and ensure dissemination of accurate information.

Clinical implications of telemedicine for providers and patients

“…In the urology community, an analysis of commercial and Medicare claims data found that fewer than 1% of urologists were using video visits in 2019 ( 2 ). In the female infertility world, before the pandemic, patients were increasingly using social media and fertility-tracking applications to obtain and engage with reproductive health information, but the use of telemedicine in patient care was far from routine ( 3 ). The rapid acceleration in the adoption of telemedicine was the consequence of public health constraints of routine in-person medical care imposed by public health officials and the removal of significant regulatory barriers by state and national governments ( 4 ).…”

Gynecology Meets Big Data in the Disruptive Innovation Medical Era: State-of-Art and Future Prospects

“…Physicians’ communication, while preserving trustworthiness and scholarly rigor, should be accessible to the lay public, aiming at improving their health literacy, promoting healthy lifestyles, and increasing and enhancing the awareness of preventative strategies. To this end, advocacy and the celebrity effect could be exploited [ 58 , 62 ].…”

“Online” and “at-home” versus traditional models of health care: enhancing access or impeding optimal therapeutics?

“…One significant change has been an increased use of telehealth services. Certainly, even before the current health crisis, patients were increasingly using social media and fertility tracking applications on their electronic devices to obtain and engage with reproductive health information ( 41 ). Although these technological advances may offer some benefits, it is critical to ensure the safe delivery of the highest quality care and the dissemination of accurate information.…”