1995
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infertility: Inter-observer agreement in analysis of basal body temperature graphs from infertile women

Abstract: In this study, we evaluated the reproducibility of analysis of basal body temperature graphs under optimized conditions for agreement. A total of 160 recordings were selected from spontaneous cycles of infertile women and analysed by three experienced clinicians using uniform criteria. Agreement at the various stages of analysis was assessed by the 'proportions of agreement' with 95% confidence intervals. Agreement in identification of the thermal nadir was clearly superior to that reported in previous publica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would indicate SWS can be used effectively in a population with ovulatory dysfunction whether it is previously known or not. This is also a useful result given the drawbacks of BBT outlined by previous clinical literature (Lenton et al, 1977;Martinez et al, 1992;Ayres-de-Campos et al, 1995;Barron and Fehring, 2005;Mazerolle et al, 2011).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Ovulation Timing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This would indicate SWS can be used effectively in a population with ovulatory dysfunction whether it is previously known or not. This is also a useful result given the drawbacks of BBT outlined by previous clinical literature (Lenton et al, 1977;Martinez et al, 1992;Ayres-de-Campos et al, 1995;Barron and Fehring, 2005;Mazerolle et al, 2011).…”
Section: Diagnosis and Ovulation Timing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Their temperature curves are generally more erratic, increasing the difficulty of interpreting charts and hence confirming 1) the presence or absence of ovulation and 2) the day of ovulation. The difficulty in the use of the ovulation day for predicting ovulation and the fertile window for a subsequent cycle-goal 3)-is compounded by the irregularity of their ovulation timing and or cycles, which makes it considerably less likely that ovulation will re-occur on the same day in a subsequent cycle even if it could be established accurately in the first place (Ayres- de-Campos et al, 1995).…”
Section: Clinical and Scientific Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was achieved through charting and analyzing temperatures taken using the thermometer and BMSW, which was performed both visually as well as quantitatively using MTM [ 15 ]. Visual analysis was performed independently by 2 or 3 observers, blinded to group allocation, following the criteria outlined in Table 1 [ 16 ]. The level of agreement between two methods in detecting possible ovulation and interrater reliability were determined using Kappa statistics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This took into account differences in the properties of the primary outcome by age, with the score tending to linearity in those ≥ 8 years old, but behaving non-linearly for those aged < 8 years. 26 Furthermore, there was a discontinuity within the secondary outcome instruments (i.e. self-reports for those in the older group and proxy reports for those in the younger group).…”
Section: Randomisationmentioning
confidence: 99%