Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Temperature monitoring is the most important surveillance in thermal assets, but temperature logging is limited in frequencies and locations. In addition, it is extremely difficult to review all the measured temperature and injection data manually since there are 10,000+ wells in Kern River field. To overcome the limitations, data-driven reservoir temperature models are presented that are built using past temperature logs and steam injection rates of the Kern River field, California. Based on the physics and geologic understanding the reservoir, adequate input features were selected and queried. Data cleanup was conducted to remove erroneous data or fix data errors using statistical tools such as multivariate Gaussian distribution. Voronoi diagram based dynamic injector selection algorithm (DISA) was developed to correctly capture the injectors which impact on temperature changes of a temperature observation well. Based on geologic characteristics of the Kern River, reservoir was divided into two sub-reservoirs, North-East and South-West. Two full field models were developed for predicting maximum and mean temperatures of a heated zone with multi-layer perceptron for both sub-reservoirs using about 120,000 data points from over 25,000 temperature curves measured at 700+ temperature observation wells. To estimate proper model update frequencies and verify the process, three yearly models (models 2015, 2016, and 2017) were built and validated by using one-year future temperature predictions in 2016, 2017, and 2018. For instance, model 2015 was trained with data until the end of 2015 and validated against 2016 data. Maximum temperature prediction r2 of 2017 South-West and North-East models were 0.96 and 0.98, respectively. Model 2017 has been deployed for alerting exception cases automatically and flagging abnormal temperature measurements. Also, the models improve the quality of heat injection design by providing temperature predictions based on planned heat injection rates. This novel automated workflow with data-driven models enhances reservoir management efficiency by reducing engineers’ unproductive time such as data manipulation and allowing them to focus on value-added works like analysis and optimization.
Temperature monitoring is the most important surveillance in thermal assets, but temperature logging is limited in frequencies and locations. In addition, it is extremely difficult to review all the measured temperature and injection data manually since there are 10,000+ wells in Kern River field. To overcome the limitations, data-driven reservoir temperature models are presented that are built using past temperature logs and steam injection rates of the Kern River field, California. Based on the physics and geologic understanding the reservoir, adequate input features were selected and queried. Data cleanup was conducted to remove erroneous data or fix data errors using statistical tools such as multivariate Gaussian distribution. Voronoi diagram based dynamic injector selection algorithm (DISA) was developed to correctly capture the injectors which impact on temperature changes of a temperature observation well. Based on geologic characteristics of the Kern River, reservoir was divided into two sub-reservoirs, North-East and South-West. Two full field models were developed for predicting maximum and mean temperatures of a heated zone with multi-layer perceptron for both sub-reservoirs using about 120,000 data points from over 25,000 temperature curves measured at 700+ temperature observation wells. To estimate proper model update frequencies and verify the process, three yearly models (models 2015, 2016, and 2017) were built and validated by using one-year future temperature predictions in 2016, 2017, and 2018. For instance, model 2015 was trained with data until the end of 2015 and validated against 2016 data. Maximum temperature prediction r2 of 2017 South-West and North-East models were 0.96 and 0.98, respectively. Model 2017 has been deployed for alerting exception cases automatically and flagging abnormal temperature measurements. Also, the models improve the quality of heat injection design by providing temperature predictions based on planned heat injection rates. This novel automated workflow with data-driven models enhances reservoir management efficiency by reducing engineers’ unproductive time such as data manipulation and allowing them to focus on value-added works like analysis and optimization.
Lost Hills is a dual permeability Diatomite reservoir that is distinct from conventional reservoirs. Application of numerical simulation has been limited throughout field life due to the complex nature of the diatomite including low permeability (∼ 1 md) but high porosity (∼ 50%) and weak rock strength (∼ 100,000 psi of Young's modulus). Thus, many reservoir management practices are based on trial and error methods which are sub-optimal. This work aims to enhance the efficiency of reservoir management activities. The usage of Capacitance Resistance Model (CRM) has been increasing due to its simple but effective capabilities of analyzing waterflooding performances. However, CRM has innate limitations as well. The core calculation of CRM is solving nonlinear regression. Solution of nonlinear regression is not unique since it is not guaranteed to find the global minimum and is affected by solver algorithms and initial guesses. In addition to the innate limitations, due to the lack of bottomhole pressure data in the Lost Hills and its high oil viscosity (∼ 20 °API), the accuracy of Lost Hills CRM solution is not enough to be used in daily operations. Stochastic CRM (SCRM) was developed to mitigate these limitations by combining bootstrap with CRM and provides stochastic answers. SCRM estimates probabilities of an initial solution using bootstrap, substitutes low probable parameter values with P50 values, and updates injector-producer connection pairs and its interwell connectivity. SCRM was developed for analyzing waterflooding operations such as identification of ineffective injector-producer connection pairs and estimation of reservoir pressure. SCRM analysis results were benchmarked against the Lost Hills tracer test data and demonstrated that SCRM provided a better solution than CRM. Compared to the fact that the deterministic solution from CRM found only 50% of connection pairs which tracer identified, SCRM solution identified 10 out of the 12 tracer identified connections. After the verification, SCRM was applied to find out connected injectors which cause Fluid Over Pump (FOP) wells. The existing workflow for identifying connected injectors was a trial and error method and hard to find connected injectors if connected injectors are located farther than 300 ft from FOP wells (chronic FOP wells). The novel workflow has been deployed so that FOP wells can be mitigated systematically and enable the optimization team to improve its reservoir management efficiency. In 2017, 10 chronic FOP wells were mitigated by identifying connected injectors with the novel workflow.
Digitalization and intelligence are attracting increasing attention in petroleum engineering. Amounts of published research indicates modern data science has been applied in almost every corner of petroleum engineering where data generates, however, mature products are few or the performance are not up to peoples’ expectations. Despite the great success in other industries (internet, transportation, and finance, etc.), the "amazing" data science algorithms seem to be challenged when "landing" in petroleum engineering. It is time to calmly analyze current situations and discuss the methodology to apply modern data science in petroleum engineering, for safety ensuring, efficiency improvement and cost saving. Based on the experiences of several data products in petroleum engineering and wide investigation of literatures, the methodology is summarized by answering some important questions: what is the difference between petroleum engineering and other industries and what are the greatest challenges for algorithms "landing"? how could we build a data product development team? why the machine learning models didn't work well in real world, which are derived by typical procedures in textbooks? are current artificial intelligent algorithms perfect and is there any limit? how could we deal with the relationship between prior knowledge and data-driven methods? what is the key point to keep data product competitive? Several specific scenarios are introduced as examples, such as ROP modelling, drilling parameters optimization, text mining of drilling reports and well production prediction, etc. where deep learning, traditional machine learning, incremental learning and natural language processing methods, etc. are used. Besides detailed discussions in the paper, conclusions are summarized as: 1) the strengths and weakness of current artificial intelligence should be viewed objectively, practical suggestions to make up the weakness are provided; 2) the combination of prior knowledge (from lab tests or expert experiences) and data-driven methods are always necessary and methods for the combination are summarized; 3) data volume and solution portability are the key points to improve data product competitiveness; 4) suggestions on how to build a multi-disciplinary R&D team and how to plan a product are provided. This paper conducts an objective analysis on challenges for modern data science applying in petroleum engineering and provides a clear methodology and specific suggestions on how to improve the success rate of R&D projects which apply data science to solve problems in petroleum engineering.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.