2007
DOI: 10.1137/040618631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinite Horizon Risk Sensitive Control of Discrete Time Markov Processes under Minorization Property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the eigenvector f * obtained in Corollary 6.1 is in P. It is straightforward to see that under condition (20), the conclusions of Lemma 5.3, Lemma 5.4 and Corollary 5.1 continue to be valid in this case, while the proofs require suitable modifications. In particular, the unique proper invariant set is…”
Section: Lemma 61mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the eigenvector f * obtained in Corollary 6.1 is in P. It is straightforward to see that under condition (20), the conclusions of Lemma 5.3, Lemma 5.4 and Corollary 5.1 continue to be valid in this case, while the proofs require suitable modifications. In particular, the unique proper invariant set is…”
Section: Lemma 61mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This has been extensively studied, e.g., in Kontoyiannis and Meyn (2003) [25] and Kontoyiannis and Meyn (2005) [26]. See also the works of Di Masi and Stettner [20], [21] for risk-sensitive control on general state spaces, which also address this issue.…”
Section: Proof Writing (15) Asṙ(t) = H(r(t)) For a Suitably Defined mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result follows from the proof of Proposition 1 of [2]. Namely by Remark 3 of [2] under (A3) the assumptions (B1) and (B3) of [2] are satisfied.…”
Section: Multiplicative Poisson Equationmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The meaning of the splitting is explained in the following two results from [2] Lemma 2.1: Under the Markov control (a n ) ∈ U M the process (x n = (x 1 n , x 2 n )) is Markov with the transition operator P a n ,θ (x n , dy) defined by (i)-(iii) and if (a n ) ∈ U s , the process has a unique invariant measure Ψ (a n ),θ given by…”
Section: Splitting Of Markov Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation