1996
DOI: 10.1109/9.539437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinite horizon stable predictive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the transforms (20), (23) and (26), one can see that (29) is equivalent to condition (18). Similar to [6], it is easy to prove that condition (19) guarantees that input constraints are satisfied.…”
Section: Stability and Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the transforms (20), (23) and (26), one can see that (29) is equivalent to condition (18). Similar to [6], it is easy to prove that condition (19) guarantees that input constraints are satisfied.…”
Section: Stability and Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 1. For those discrete-time vertex systems given in (14), suppose there exist S ands such that conditions (18) and (19) hold. Then the SMPC proposed in Section 3 is feasible to steer any initial state from M into ν.…”
Section: Stability and Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infinite horizon MPC are in any case a practical route to achieving stability as there exist very efficient ways to solve the corresponding huge quadratic programming problems [17]. Therefore, it is assumed that as the prediction horizon P → ∞, α 11 ∼ = α 12 ∼ = · · · ∼ = α n u n u .…”
Section: Analytical Overview Of Epcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category, e.g. infinite horizon predictive control [6] , terminal constraints [7∼12] and fake algebraic Riccati equations [5] , focuses on introducing some terminal penalties into the performance index function, so that stability is guaranteed by satisfying some special conditions which are employed to prevent the performance index from increasing. The second category puts emphasis on imposing extra state constraints on the online optimization process rather than modifying the performance index function itself [13∼16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%