2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40993-016-0050-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinite product exponents for modular forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing results in the literature (e.g. [1]) do not seem sufficient to show that all elements of B 0 satisfy the restriction in Proposition 3.2. By Borcherds's isomorphism Theorem 3.1, showing all such functions do meet this restriction would be equivalent to proving a result on the non-vanishing of Fourier coefficients for some weight 1/2 weakly holomorphic modular forms on Γ 0 (4).…”
Section: A Proof Of Theorem 12 Via the Product Formulamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Existing results in the literature (e.g. [1]) do not seem sufficient to show that all elements of B 0 satisfy the restriction in Proposition 3.2. By Borcherds's isomorphism Theorem 3.1, showing all such functions do meet this restriction would be equivalent to proving a result on the non-vanishing of Fourier coefficients for some weight 1/2 weakly holomorphic modular forms on Γ 0 (4).…”
Section: A Proof Of Theorem 12 Via the Product Formulamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The present text was written in 2016 and it was distributed among few experts in the area. Since then there have been some developments and we knew of some other related works, see [1]. However, its main conjecture is still open, and so we decided to publish it as it is.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Ali and Mani [3] proved an upper bound for exponents c(m) in the product expansion of f . The sum d|m dc(d) looks like a kind of convolution of σ 1 (m) (a sum of divisors) and σ f (m) (a sum of exponents of f ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%