2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflamed skin predisposes to sensitization to less potent allergens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that patients with severe AD are less susceptible to sensitisation to potent allergens, as there is a threshold beyond which exposure through chronically defective skin barrier leads to tolerance. 2,37,38 Additionally, because AD is considered to be immunologically driven by a Th2 response, it may be anticipated that affected individuals are less susceptible to develop contact allergy, which is primarily Th1-driven. [10][11][12] Sensitisation to contact allergens via the Th2 rather than the Th1 route has been suggested in individuals with AD, 10 and this could explain differences in sensitisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that patients with severe AD are less susceptible to sensitisation to potent allergens, as there is a threshold beyond which exposure through chronically defective skin barrier leads to tolerance. 2,37,38 Additionally, because AD is considered to be immunologically driven by a Th2 response, it may be anticipated that affected individuals are less susceptible to develop contact allergy, which is primarily Th1-driven. [10][11][12] Sensitisation to contact allergens via the Th2 rather than the Th1 route has been suggested in individuals with AD, 10 and this could explain differences in sensitisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancies in the various experimental, clinical and epidemiological studies have recently been discussed and argued that multiple allergen and host factors may affect the association between AD and contact sensitization including Th‐2 cytokine milieu in AD which might lower the risk of contact sensitization, difference in exposure pattern to allergens between AD patients and healthy individuals and a higher prevalence of false‐positive patch test reactions in AD, particularly in the case of metal allergens . Interestingly, Kohli and Nedorost found that AD predisposes to sensitization only to less potent allergens arguing that potent sensitizers are often strong irritants that damage the skin barrier and trigger innate immune response needed for the induction of allergic response. Consistently, Koppes et al reported that a strong contact allergen methyl⁄chloromethylisothiazolinone known for its corrosive and irritant properties causes remarkable alterations of the corneocyte surface topography and reduction in NMF, similarly to SLS.…”
Section: Impaired Skin Barrier As a Risk Factor For Contact Dermatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] Based on human and animal studies, it is also well-known that an impaired skin barrier facilitates penetration of substances, and that skin sensitization is enhanced by exposure of inflamed skin (eg, dermatitis) and occluded skin (eg, by diapers and gloves). 26,27 The higher occurrence of having a parent born outside Sweden, Norway, Denmark, or Finland among participants without the assessed FLG mutations in our study may be explained by the fact that other types of FLG mutations are prevalent outside Europe, while our study assessed the mutations most common here. 28 Association between FLG mutation and nickel allergy among adults in the general population has been studied with conflicting results; two studies based on selected participants (an enriched sample with atopic diseases in Germany, and a small subsample of non-pierced individuals in Denmark, respectively) indicated an association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%