Inflated Responses in Measures of Self-Assessed Health

Abstract

Abstract/SummaryThis paper focuses on the self-reported responses given to survey questions of the form In general how would you rate your health? with typical response items being on a scale ranging from poor to excellent. Usually, the overwhelming majority of responses fall in either the middle category or the one immediately to the "right" of this (in the above example, good and very good). However, based on a wide range of other medical indicators, such favourable responses appear to paint an overly rosy picture of true health. The hypothesis here is that these "middle" responses have been, in some sense, inflated. That is, for whatever reason, a significant number of responders inaccurately report into these categories. We find a significant amount of inflation into these categories. Adjusted responses to these questions could lead to significant changes in policy, and should be reflected upon when analysing and interpreting these scales. Keywords: Self-assessed health, inflated outcomes, mis-reporting, ordered probit, panel data.JEL codes: C3, C5, I1. 1 We are grateful to the Australian Research Council to help fund this research. We are also grateful to Michael Shields, David Johnson, Nigel Rice, John Wildman and Andrew Jones for useful comments and suggestions, and also to seminar participants at

Objective vs. subjective fuel poverty and self-assessed health

“…Responses related to self-reported health status of surveyed individuals may not always correspond with the objective clinical condition of the individuals. In that sense, Greene et al (2015) have proposed a model to identify potential inflation of responses, i.e., whether people tend to report that their health is good or very good. In a random sample of Australian population they found around 10% probability of inaccurate reporting in the good and very good categories.…”

Do Minimum Wage Increases Influence Worker Health?

“…Labor studies suggest that individuals may underreport health as poor health is viewed as a socially acceptable explanation for not working or for limited labor supply (Bound 1991;Bound, Brown, and Mathiowetz 2001;Currie and Madrian 1999). On the other hand, recent work by Greene, Harris, and Hollingsworth (2015) suggests a somewhat more nuanced pattern of reporting error in self-reported general health. For example, using the 5-point scale that we study, the authors document a tendency of respondents to report their general health as "good" or "very good" (i.e., the middle response and the response one "to the right" of the middle response on a 5-point scale).…”

“…However, to the best of our knowledge, it is not possible to accurately sign the bias for our continuous self-reported health variables. 21 The econometrics methods designed to account for reporting error in self-reported health rely on access to panel data (i.e., repeated observations on the individuals providing selfreported health), instrumental variables in the case of mismeasured right-hand-side variables, or survey design techniques in contingent valuation and other stated preferences studies (Bound, Brown, and Mathiowetz 2001;Greene, Harris, and Hollingsworth 2015;Maclean et al 2015). Given that we rely on the BRFSS, which is composed of repeated cross sections and is an observational study collected by the CDC, and the self-reported variables are our dependent variables, such methods are unfortunately not available to us.…”

Who provides inconsistent reports of their health status? The importance of age, cognitive ability and socioeconomic status

“…Important issues are the existence of systematic differences in how individuals assess their health and report it on an ordinal scale, and how this reporting heterogeneity could obscure true health inequalities (Kerkhofs and Lindeboom, 1995;Lindeboom and Van Doorslaer, 2004;Etilé and Milcent, 2006;Bago d'Uva et al, 2011;Layes et al, 2012;Greene et al 2015). For example, Bago d'Uva et al (2011) find no socioeconomic inequality in visits to the doctor when SAH is used to measure health need, but after correcting SAH for reporting heterogeneity, that inequality favours the moreeducated.…”