Background:
Side branch (SB) occlusion after main vessel stenting is
the main complication in treating coronary bifurcation lesions by provisional
stenting. The Jailed Wire Technique (JWT), recommended by the European
Bifurcation Club, is a standard technique to deal with this issue. The Jailed
Balloon Technique (JBT) has been found to be more effective than the JWT in
clinical practice by some interventionists, but it has not been widely accepted.
In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of JBT and JWT.
Methods:
The literature comparing JBT and JWT was systematically
reviewed. Stata/MP 17.0 was used to perform a meta-analysis. The primary
endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, myocardial
infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary
endpoints were SB occlusion and SB dissection. Aggregated odds ratios and 95%
confidence intervals were calculated. A sensitivity analysis was conducted
if
was
50% or
p
0.01.
Results:
Thirteen studies involving 1789 patients were enrolled. JBT was found to have a
significantly lower incidence of MACE, SB occlusion and dissection. The incidence
of cardiac death, MI and TLR were also lower in the JBT group, though the
differences were not significant.
Conclusions:
JBT prevents SB occlusion
more effectively and does not increase immediate or long-term complications. JBT,
or its modified versions, can be used to treat SBs with a high risk of occlusion.