2018
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflationary predictions of double-well, Coleman-Weinberg, and hilltop potentials with non-minimal coupling

Abstract: We discuss how the non-minimal coupling ξφ 2 R between the inflaton and the Ricci scalar affects the predictions of single field inflation models where the inflaton has a non-zero vacuum expectation value (VEV) v after inflation. We show that, for inflaton values both above the VEV and below the VEV during inflation, under certain conditions the inflationary predictions become approximately the same as the predictions of the Starobinsky model. We then analyze inflation with double-well and Coleman-Weinberg pot… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(177 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the presence of a symmetrybreaking potential; one can include the non-zero vacuum expectation value into the picture by taking f (φ) = φ 2 − v 2 as first suggested in ref. [57]. This term requires a symmetry-breaking (v = φ) after the inflation to restore the usual Einstein-Hilbert term √ −gR/2.…”
Section: Modified Gravitational Sector (Jordan Frame)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of a symmetrybreaking potential; one can include the non-zero vacuum expectation value into the picture by taking f (φ) = φ 2 − v 2 as first suggested in ref. [57]. This term requires a symmetry-breaking (v = φ) after the inflation to restore the usual Einstein-Hilbert term √ −gR/2.…”
Section: Modified Gravitational Sector (Jordan Frame)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential has been frequently studied in the context of cosmic inflation and spontaneous symmetry breaking [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. It is a particular realisation of the family of quadratic hilltop potentials [23] that ensures positivity (required here for the calculation of the Planck surface).…”
Section: Hilltop Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are using units that the reduced Planck scale m P = 1/ √ 8πG ≈ 2.4 × 10 18 GeV is set equal to unity, thus we consider F (φ) → 1 or φ → 0 after inflation. In that case, by taking into consideration m 2 = 1 − ξv 2 , we obtain [33]. What is more, we take into account Palatini quadratic potential in the large-field limit, so to be able to compute observational parameters, we take F (φ) = 1 + ξφ 2 .…”
Section: Palatini Inflation With a Non-minimal Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%