1996
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450740217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence du dodecyl sulfate de sodium sur la tension interfaciale du système biphasé butanol‐eau

Abstract: Le présent article a pour objet l'étude expérimentale de la tension interfaciale entre les deux phases formées par le système partiellement miscible composé du butanol‐1 et de l'eau. En utilisant la méthode du volume de la goutte, l'effet d'un agent tensioactif, le dodécyl sulfate de sodium, sur la tension interfaciale fut étudié. On a trouvé que l'addition de l'agent tensioactif à la phase riche en butanol (la phase de goutte) cause une baisse légère de la tension dont la magnitude est influencée par le temps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitatively, the same effect has been previously observed for a nonequilibrated 1-butanol−water system . In that case, the values measured using a drop volume tensiometer were significantly smaller (between 2 and 2.5 mN m -1 ) than those that we obtained. While the experimental procedure they used is not detailed enough for us to give a justification for this large difference in the results from the two methodologies, one possible explanation could be the fact that dynamic interfacial tension values measured with the drop volume method are quite dependent on the capillary flow rates (with larger IT measured at higher capillary flow rate) .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…Qualitatively, the same effect has been previously observed for a nonequilibrated 1-butanol−water system . In that case, the values measured using a drop volume tensiometer were significantly smaller (between 2 and 2.5 mN m -1 ) than those that we obtained. While the experimental procedure they used is not detailed enough for us to give a justification for this large difference in the results from the two methodologies, one possible explanation could be the fact that dynamic interfacial tension values measured with the drop volume method are quite dependent on the capillary flow rates (with larger IT measured at higher capillary flow rate) .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 89%