2017
DOI: 10.1134/s0031918x17120134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of a Polymer Coating and the Compacting Pressure on the Magnetic Properties of Cobalt-Based Amorphous Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When choosing the material, an important point is the fact that the selection of heat treatment conditions allows one to form the ribbon states characterized by different signs of saturation magnetostriction without any changes in the elemental composition. The studies were performed using samples in the quenched (Q) state and after heat treatments (HTs) in air at 370 and 380°С, which form states differing in the sign of magnetostriction constant; the time of the isothermal holding being 10 and 40 min [13]. The magnetization curves were measured by the induction-pulse method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When choosing the material, an important point is the fact that the selection of heat treatment conditions allows one to form the ribbon states characterized by different signs of saturation magnetostriction without any changes in the elemental composition. The studies were performed using samples in the quenched (Q) state and after heat treatments (HTs) in air at 370 and 380°С, which form states differing in the sign of magnetostriction constant; the time of the isothermal holding being 10 and 40 min [13]. The magnetization curves were measured by the induction-pulse method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The errors of measurements of the magnetic induction and magnetic field did not exceed 2% and the error of measurements of the maximum magnetic permeability did not exceed 3%. The magnetization distribution in the ribbon was determined by an original technique, which was developed by us, using the correlation dependence between the maximum values of residual induction (B rs ) and volume of domains with the orthogonal magnetization component, which was obtained by Mössbauer spectroscopy and measuring residual induction in minor hysteresis loops [13,14]. The relative error of determination of the magnetization distribution did not exceed 5%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement errors of the magnetic induction and field strength did not exceed 2%; the measurement error of magnetic permeability did not exceed 3%. The volume of domains with orthogonal magnetization, which is the indirect characteristic of the level of internal stresses, was determined using the correlation dependence between the maximum values of the residual induction and volume of domains with an orthogonal magnetization component, which was obtained by Mössbauer studies [7,8]. The relative error of determination of the magnetization did not exceed 5%.…”
Section: Electrical and Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%