2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of AC fields and electrical conduction mechanisms on the flash-onset temperature: Electronic (BiFeO3) vs. ionic conductors (8YSZ)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, certain phenomena cannot be explained merely in terms of Joule heating but rather as a consequence of the interaction between the material and the applied electric field. Frequency response of flashing systems under AC fields [5], electroluminescence [6], enhanced diffusion kinetics [7][8][9] and defect generation and migration [10,11] are some athermal effects detected during FS. In fact, it was hypothesized that a field-assisted mechanism of avalanche and nucleation of Frenkel defects, boosting diffusion rates and electrical conductivity, might be the cause of the flash event [12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, certain phenomena cannot be explained merely in terms of Joule heating but rather as a consequence of the interaction between the material and the applied electric field. Frequency response of flashing systems under AC fields [5], electroluminescence [6], enhanced diffusion kinetics [7][8][9] and defect generation and migration [10,11] are some athermal effects detected during FS. In fact, it was hypothesized that a field-assisted mechanism of avalanche and nucleation of Frenkel defects, boosting diffusion rates and electrical conductivity, might be the cause of the flash event [12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%