2014
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00031-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Acanthamoeba Genotype on Clinical Course and Outcomes for Patients with Acanthamoeba Keratitis in Spain

Abstract: Genotype T4 is by far the most frequent genotype of Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) and therefore has been considered the most virulent. This study included 14 cases of AK of genotype T4 and three cases of non-T4 genotype. We found that cases of non-T4 genotype had a worse response to medical therapy, greater need for surgical intervention, greater risk of extracorneal involvement, and remarkably poorer final visual outcome than those of T4 genotype, suggesting an association between Acanthamoeba virulence and gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both contact‐lens related and non‐contact‐lens related corneal isolates are most commonly associated with the T4 genotype which includes the species A. castellanii, A. polyphaga and A. culbertsonii . While one study has suggested that non‐T4 genotypes may be associated with a more severe manifestation of the disease, it does appear that non‐contact lens related Acanthamoeba keratitis, while also caused by T4 strains, is associated with a more advanced disease on delayed diagnosis and more severe disease presentation, evidenced by a greater need for surgery and poorer final visual outcome …”
Section: Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both contact‐lens related and non‐contact‐lens related corneal isolates are most commonly associated with the T4 genotype which includes the species A. castellanii, A. polyphaga and A. culbertsonii . While one study has suggested that non‐T4 genotypes may be associated with a more severe manifestation of the disease, it does appear that non‐contact lens related Acanthamoeba keratitis, while also caused by T4 strains, is associated with a more advanced disease on delayed diagnosis and more severe disease presentation, evidenced by a greater need for surgery and poorer final visual outcome …”
Section: Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both contact-lens related and non-contact-lens related corneal isolates are most commonly associated with the T4 genotype [17][18][19][20][21][22] which includes the species A. castellanii, A. polyphaga and A. culbertsonii. 23 While one study has suggested that non-T4 genotypes may be associated with a more severe manifestation of the disease, 24 it does appear that non-contact lens related Acanthamoeba keratitis, while also caused by T4 strains, 21 is associated with a more advanced disease on delayed diagnosis and more severe disease presentation, evidenced by a greater need for surgery and poorer final visual outcome. 25 The pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba keratitis Compared with bacterial keratitis, there is relatively limited information on the pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba disease, including the role of virulence characteristics of the pathogen, the host response and the impact of the environment.…”
Section: Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed that an early start of a specific therapeutic procedure may increase the chances of restoring normal health conditions with minimal side effects and maximum patient's quality of life at the bedside [4,5]. For instance, laboratory assays of Acanthamoeba strains and clinical isolates on in vitro drug sensitivity tests [1,6,7] development of new therapeutic patterns [8,9] the characterization of differential virulence factors, as well as investigation of the cytopathic effects in cell culture and animal models [10][11][12] provide meaningful data.…”
Section: Translational Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time PCRcan also give an estimate of parasite load through quantification of DNA copy number, which is associated with poor outcome [17]. Other possible applications of molecular techniques are detection of new species and genotypes of a specific microorganism [18,19] epidemiological survey, establishment of etiological link between source and infection [14,20] recognition of physiological differences (eg growth rate, metabolism) and screening of virulence profiles observed on in traspecific variations of pathogens [21,7]. However, the use of molecular diagnostics alone has not delivered the expected impact in clinical practice and patients' health.…”
Section: Translational Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation