2011
DOI: 10.1002/vnl.20262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of acetylation on the tensile properties, water absorption, and thermal stability of (High‐density polyethylene)/(soya powder)/(kenaf core) composites

Abstract: Composites comprising high-density polyethylene (HDPE)/(soya powder)/(kenaf core) were prepared by incorporating different loads of kenaf core powder into HDPE/(soya powder) composites with an internal mixer (Haake PolyLab) for 12 min at 1808C and 50 rpm. The composition of the soya powder used was soluble carbohydrates, 15%; insoluble carbohydrates, 15%; oil, 18%; protein, 38%; and moisture, ash, other, 14%. The effect of kenaf core acetylation on the properties of the HDPE/(soya powder)/(kenaf core) composit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in the figure, as the PSP loading increased, the tensile modulus of both composites also increased marginally. As stated earlier, the stiffness of composite materials can be increased with the presence of rigid filler particles in the soft matrix . Yet again, during comparison of the tensile modulus of both composites after 6 months of exposure to natural weathering, the treated composites showed a slightly higher tensile modulus than the untreated composites.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…As shown in the figure, as the PSP loading increased, the tensile modulus of both composites also increased marginally. As stated earlier, the stiffness of composite materials can be increased with the presence of rigid filler particles in the soft matrix . Yet again, during comparison of the tensile modulus of both composites after 6 months of exposure to natural weathering, the treated composites showed a slightly higher tensile modulus than the untreated composites.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Therefore, it increased their interfacial adhesion. Better adhesion led to more restriction of the deformation capacity of the matrix in the elastic zone and increased modulus .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of rigid filler particles in the soft matrix develops the stiffness of composite materials. 10,13,14 When comparing both composites, the treated composites had a slightly higher tensile modulus than the untreated composites. There are few factors that could have affected the tensile modulus of treated composites, such as aspect ratio and degree of molecular orientation.…”
Section: Tensile Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%