1975
DOI: 10.1021/ac60358a062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of added electrolyte to the stationary phase on retention and selectivity in gas-liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selectivity was approached thermodynamically (8951, on the basis of solution theory (1101 1, and electron donor-acceptor interactions (949), from the dependence of selectivity coefficients on the surface tension of the stationary phase (68,1266), and in terms of the relative retention calculated from vapor pressure and molecular volume data of the solutes (412). Selectivity was modified by adding electrolytes (863) and surface active agents (221) to the liquid phase. The dependence of the retention behavior on the stationary phase molecular weight was derived by Martire (1055), while Haken (653) considered incremental polarity effects.…”
Section: Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selectivity was approached thermodynamically (8951, on the basis of solution theory (1101 1, and electron donor-acceptor interactions (949), from the dependence of selectivity coefficients on the surface tension of the stationary phase (68,1266), and in terms of the relative retention calculated from vapor pressure and molecular volume data of the solutes (412). Selectivity was modified by adding electrolytes (863) and surface active agents (221) to the liquid phase. The dependence of the retention behavior on the stationary phase molecular weight was derived by Martire (1055), while Haken (653) considered incremental polarity effects.…”
Section: Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the use of water as a stationary phase component has been relatively much less explored. For instance, early reports on gas‐ and liquid‐phase separations investigated aqueous layers on stationary phase particles for their impact on surface activity and chromatographic selectivity . In modern regards, HILIC methods also rely on the formation of an aqueous layer for analyte partitioning .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there have been a few reports of water forming a coating on solid support particles in the early development of GC. Although water’s use as a GC stationary phase coating was initially limited in its analytical utility due to its polar nature and in situ volatility, it did prove very useful in physical chemistry applications to quantify various interfacial , and solution , properties of molecules. Subsequently, aqueous solutions containing various ions have been used in analytical GC as coatings on solid particles in order to alter analyte selectivity. , Beyond this, there have also been some isolated reports of the use of water as an HPLC stationary phase, either coated on a solid particle or as a pure, solid, water−ice phase itself . Furthermore, in relation to this, liquid water has also been used to form a pseudostationary phase in the absence of any solid support particles in a number of alternative separation techniques such as counter-current chromatography (CCC), cocurrent chromatography, and radial tube distribution chromatography …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, aqueous solutions containing various ions have been used in analytical GC as coatings on solid particles in order to alter analyte selectivity. 21,22 Beyond this, there have also been some isolated reports of the use of water as an HPLC stationary phase, either coated on a solid particle 23 or as a pure, solid, water-ice phase itself. 24 Furthermore, in relation to this, liquid water has also been used to form a pseudostationary phase in the absence of any solid support particles in a number of alternative separation techniques such as counter-current chromatography (CCC), 25 cocurrent chromatography, 26 and radial tube distribution chromatography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%