2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of additive on ash and combustion characteristics during biomass combustion under O2/CO2 atmosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, ash content contains calcium, potassium, magnesium, and phosphorus. One problem that hinders the thermal process of biomass is the deposition and agglomeration caused by minerals in ash melts [40]. Therefore, a higher fixed carbon content promotes higher calorific energy in the charcoal produced.…”
Section: Proximate and Ultimate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, ash content contains calcium, potassium, magnesium, and phosphorus. One problem that hinders the thermal process of biomass is the deposition and agglomeration caused by minerals in ash melts [40]. Therefore, a higher fixed carbon content promotes higher calorific energy in the charcoal produced.…”
Section: Proximate and Ultimate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was the similar case with dolomite additives [17]. Phosphorous based additives, such as NH4H2PO4 in the work of Wang et al [18], successfully decreased slag formation, but at the same decreased the integrated combustion characteristic index and their efficiency depended on the inorganic composition of the fuel that they were added to. On the other hand, biomass mixing proved to be a more suitable solution than additives to fight slagging and agglomeration in terms of cost and effectiveness [19] and triggered the interest of many researchers during the last thirty years [6,[20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…RS-rice straw 1. Present study,2 Jenkins et al[55],3 Pandey and Kumar[59],4 Wang et al[54],5 Salour et al[34],6 Wang et al[60],…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%