Influence of Admission Functional Status on Functional Change After Stroke Rehabilitation

Inouye, Masayuki; Hashimoto, H; Mio, Takaya; Sumino, Kimiaki

doi:10.1097/00002060-200102000-00008

Cited by 53 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…11,16 The FIM has established content and construct validity, sensitivity, and interrater reliability for stroke. 10,14,15 Motor items are categorized into eating, grooming, bathing, dressing, toileting, continence, transfers, and mobility domains. Cognitive items assessed include communication, social interaction, problem solving, and memory.…”

Section: Editor's Notementioning

confidence: 99%

“…3,7,9 Stroke rehabilitation improves outcomes. 10,11 However, negative perceptions in recurrent stroke may lead clinicians to withhold intensive and comprehensive rehabilitation services which is detrimental to recovery. 2,5 Knowledge of these functional and related efficiency outcomes will facilitate optimization of rehabilitation interventions and resources.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2,5 Knowledge of these functional and related efficiency outcomes will facilitate optimization of rehabilitation interventions and resources. 10 There is scarce information on functional outcomes in recurrent stroke after inpatient rehabilitation. Previous studies did not adjust for functional severity, 6 lack a first-ever stroke control group, 12 or used a gross general disability scale such as the Modified Rankin scale rather than a specific validated rehabilitation outcome.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

How Do Recurrent and First-Ever Strokes Differ in Rehabilitation Outcomes?

Tan

Chen

et al. 2016

American Journal of Physical Medicine &Amp; Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Editor's Notementioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How Do Recurrent and First-Ever Strokes Differ in Rehabilitation Outcomes?

Tan

Chen

et al. 2016

American Journal of Physical Medicine &Amp; Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…9 The main objective is measure quantitatively what the patient with the disability can accomplish. It can also provide consistent data to follow up the patient functional degree from the beginning of rehabilitation, until and after the discharge, 10,11 and to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapeutic approach. 12 However, since 2001, with the approval of the International Classification of Functionality, Disability and Health (ICF) by the World Health Organization (WHO), the understanding of human functioning and disability came to identify not only consequences of diseases, but the unimpaired aspects of the body and those activities and participations with or without problems, together with the environmental and personal characteristics that affect the human experience.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship between the Functional Independence Measure and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Set for stroke

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is one of many instruments available for assessing the functionality of stroke patients. However, with the approval of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), the Core Set that was developed for stroke patients, a new tool for understanding functionality and disability of these patients is available. Objective: To establish a relationship between the FIM and the ICF Core Set for stroke. Four researchers of different healthcare backgrounds, all working in the field of rehabilitation, considered the descriptions of the activities of the FIM and the definitions of the ICF categories. Method: They selected the categories of the ICF Core Set for stroke, which could be related to the tasks assessed by the FIM. Once the relationship was established, the researchers came to a consensus for the inclusion or exclusion of those categories. Results: From the 130 second-level categories used in the Core Set, 27 (20.8%) were related to the activities of FIM, eight (29.6%) regarded the bodily functions component (b), 17 (63%) concerned activity and participation (d), and two (7.4%) considered environmental factors (e). As for the 10 categories that are part of the Brief Core Set for stroke, only five were related to the activities of FIM. Conclusion: The FIM is focused on the individual, while the ICF is concerned not only with the dysfunctions and disabilities of the patient, but also considers these factors within social activities, as well as environmental influences, either as a facilitator or a barrier to functional independence.

show abstract

“…Previous studies have shown that impairment on admission could predict both Functional Independence Measure (FIM) raw scores 1) and activities of daily living (ADL) scores on discharge [2][3][4][5] . Moreover, comorbidities and complications were predictive factors of ADL scores on discharge 6) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association of Ability to Rise from Bed with Improvement of Functional Limitation and Activities of Daily Living in Hemiplegic Inpatients with Stroke: a Prospective Cohort Study

Shinohara

Usuda

2010

J Phys Ther Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of ability to rise from bed with improvement in functional limitations and activities of daily living (ADL) in hemiplegic inpatients with stroke.[Subjects] Participants were 38 hemiplegic inpatients with stroke in a convalescence rehabilitation unit.[Methods] On admission, a newly developed assessment, rising from bed independence score (RIS) and rise from bed time (RBT) were measured. On discharge, the Berg Balance Scale, Functional Movement Scale, and Functional Independence Measure were measured. We calculated correlation coefficients between ability to rise from bed on admission and these traditional measures on discharge. The proportion of subjects who regained independent gait was calculated among subjects whose RIS was 7 on admission.[Results] RIS and RBT were significantly correlated with most of the traditional measures on discharge. Only RIS was significantly correlated with relative gain. Of those with RIS=7 on admission, 76.9% regained independent gait. [Conclusion] We found that ability to rise from bed of inpatients with stroke was associated with improvement of functional limitation and ADL in a convalescence rehabilitation unit. Ability to rise from bed on admission was a useful predictor of independent gait on discharge.

show abstract

Influence of Admission Functional Status on Functional Change After Stroke Rehabilitation

Cited by 53 publications

References 17 publications

How Do Recurrent and First-Ever Strokes Differ in Rehabilitation Outcomes?

How Do Recurrent and First-Ever Strokes Differ in Rehabilitation Outcomes?

The Relationship between the Functional Independence Measure and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Set for stroke

Association of Ability to Rise from Bed with Improvement of Functional Limitation and Activities of Daily Living in Hemiplegic Inpatients with Stroke: a Prospective Cohort Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About