2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2012.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of age and gender on trigeminal sensory function and magnetically evoked masseteric exteroceptive suppression reflex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPT was measured using a pressure algometer (Somedic AB, Farsta, Sweden) with a probe size of 1 cm 2 and application rate of 30 kPa/s in a perpendicular direction to the skin 20,21. The patients were instructed to press the button when the sensation under the probe changed from pressure to pressure and pain 22.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PPT was measured using a pressure algometer (Somedic AB, Farsta, Sweden) with a probe size of 1 cm 2 and application rate of 30 kPa/s in a perpendicular direction to the skin 20,21. The patients were instructed to press the button when the sensation under the probe changed from pressure to pressure and pain 22.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TDT and PDT were measured with a set of 20 calibrated Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments (Saehan, marking number 1.65–6.65; force 0.005–447 g) delivering a precise amount of pressure 20,21. To determine TDT and PDT, the method of limits was used, following a standardized protocol of five ascending and descending series 14.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among those are sex, [10][11][12] hormones, 13 age, 14,15 ethnicity, 16,17 stress 18 and anxiety. 19 It is well known that individuals with increased sensitivity to nociceptive stimuli delivered at extra-trigeminal locations are also more sensitive to nociceptive stimuli at trigeminal locations.…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, reports of age‐related decrements for the somatosensory senses (cooling, warming, touch and pain) are not consistent, and, in general, the varying results from the laboratory‐based studies reflect differences in methodologies employed, including varying types of stimuli employed to assess different modalities (e.g. contact thermal stimulation by Peltier devices or water immersion versus radiant heat for thermal assessments; vibratory, calibrated filaments or two‐point callipers for touch assessments; Peltier devices, radiant heat, water immersion, mechanical stimulation for pain assessments), variations in body regions, spatial area of skin exposed to thermal stimuli, variations in subjective measures that investigators assessed, such as threshold or suprathreshold measures and age range and maximum ages of the assessed individuals . Of note, Guergova and Dufour have reported that declines in thermal sensitivities are greater in the distal extremities than the proximal locations.…”
Section: Brief Summary Of Ageing Somatosensory Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%