Abstract. Seven hundred fifty-one environmental samples were collected from 76 chicken layer houses in a voluntary Salmonella enteritidis (SE) survey study carried out in New York state between January 15 and April 8, 1991. SE was recovered from both houses on 1 farm. Sampling of manure pits and mice in hen houses was useful for SE screening. Phage types of SE from the environment, birds, and mice were identical. The rapid whole-blood test was unreliable, and culture of cloaca1 swabs was inadequate for detection of SE carriers. Culture of organs from chickens did not correlate well with results of environmental samples.Although Salmonella enteritidis (SE) infection is actually not a serious disease of chickens, the negative publicity that has resulted from the incrimination of fresh eggs in recent human SE outbreaks' has now made SE 1 of the most important problems confronting the egg industry. The detection of SE in flocks of laying hens has thus become a public health priority and a matter of great concern to egg producers.A variety of diagnostic procedures have been developed for detection of salmonella infections in poultry. Serologic tests for paratyphoid salmonellae have low sensitivity and poor reliability.9,11 Bacteriologic culture of environmental samples has become a popular method for SE survey studies in poultry houses. The recovery of SE from internal tissues is an indication of infection with an invasive strain with a potential of transovarian contamination of eggs.2 Cloaca1 swab culture was selected for inclusion in this study to detect SE in live birds that were needed for research purpose. Although cloaca1 culture has been applied widely under field conditions, its reliability for detecting avian salmonellosis seems limited. 4,5,9 Rats and mice are frequently intestinal carriers of paratyphoid organisms.
5This paper reports findings of a field surveillance study on SE infection in commercial layers in New York state. The results of salmonella isolation from internal organs, cloaca1 swabs, and fecal samples were compared with serologic results using a rapid wholeblood test with S. pullorum antigen. Similar compar-