1994
DOI: 10.1086/269447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of an Invitation to Answer by Telephone on Response to Census Questionnaires

Abstract: An experimental test was made of whether completion rates for a census questionnaire could be improved by offering the option of calling a toll-free number and providing the requested information to an interviewer as an alternative to mailing it back. Conducted on a national probability sample of households, five treatment panels were created to examine the effect of delivering, in different ways, the invitation to respond by telephone or mail. Offering such invitations did not improve completion rates except … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most respondents, when asked whether they would prefer to answer survey questions in person, on the telephone, by mail, or by Web, report a mode preference. We refer to "mode preference" as a positive view toward participating in a particular mode rather than "mode choice," the mode one selects when given multiple options Dillman, West, and Clark 1994;Levenstein 2009;Shih and Fan 2002). Respondents express their preference to participate in face-to-face interviews (Groves and Kahn 1979), telephone surveys (Smyth, Olson, and Richards 2009), mail surveys (Gilbert 2009;Levenstein 2009;Millar, O'Neill, and Dillman 2009;Miller et al 2002;Tarnai and Paxson 2004), and Web surveys (Gilbert 2009;Miller et al 2002;Ryan et al 2002;Tarnai and Paxson 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most respondents, when asked whether they would prefer to answer survey questions in person, on the telephone, by mail, or by Web, report a mode preference. We refer to "mode preference" as a positive view toward participating in a particular mode rather than "mode choice," the mode one selects when given multiple options Dillman, West, and Clark 1994;Levenstein 2009;Shih and Fan 2002). Respondents express their preference to participate in face-to-face interviews (Groves and Kahn 1979), telephone surveys (Smyth, Olson, and Richards 2009), mail surveys (Gilbert 2009;Levenstein 2009;Millar, O'Neill, and Dillman 2009;Miller et al 2002;Tarnai and Paxson 2004), and Web surveys (Gilbert 2009;Miller et al 2002;Ryan et al 2002;Tarnai and Paxson 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interviewee had to turn on the computer, connect to the Internet, type the web site, and enter the ID number to get identified. Many of the interviewees decide to postpone answering, and this produced ''a break in the response process'' (Dillman et al, 1994;Griffin et al, 2001). This ''break in the response process'' (Griffin et al, 2001) on many occasions results in failure to answer, as some respondents forget or lose interest.…”
Section: Response Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most survey researchers do not have a measure of sample members' mode preferences prior to conducting their surveys, making assignment of a 'preferred mode' difficult. Instead, survey organizations draw on conventional wisdom about which demographic groups prefer particular modes (e.g., young people will prefer web), sometimes using studies that look at which groups choose which mode when offered a choice between two modes as guidance (e.g., Denniston et al, 2000;Dillman et al, 1994;Dillman et al, 2009;Diment and Garrett-Jones, 2007;Shih and Fan, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%