Influence of Analytic Processing on Divergent and Convergent Thinking Tasks: The Role of Rational and Experiential Thinking Styles

Abstract

Scientific interest in the relationship between analytic processing and creativity has increased in recent years. However, there is conflicting evidence on whether analytic processing reduces or enhances creativity. We hypothesize that differences in creativity measurement paradigms (divergent or convergent thinking tasks) and the research orientation of analytic processing (dispositional or situational) may explain the conflicting findings. The present study aims to investigate how priming analytic processing affects individuals’ performance on divergent and convergent thinking tasks and the moderating role of thinking styles. In Study 1 (N = 155), participants were assigned to either an analytic processing group or a control group and performed convergent thinking (Remote Associates Task) and divergent thinking (Alternative Uses Test) tasks after priming. In Study 2 (N = 119), we conducted a priming paradigm of analytic processing that differed from Study 1, and a personal experiential-rational thinking style was introduced as a moderator. Results showed that priming analytic processing promoted convergent thinking performance but decreased fluency and flexibility scores on the divergent thinking task (Study 1). Notably, the effect of priming analytic processing on divergent thinking performance was significant only for participants with higher levels of rational thinking style (Study 2). These results suggest that thinking styles and dimensions of creativity should be considered in the relationship between analytic processing and creativity.

Thinking Style Moderates the Impact of the Classroom Environment on Language Creativity

“…Depending on the needs of the task, Type 3 styles, which include anarchic (managing a variety of activities), oligarchic (working on numerous tasks concurrently without regard to priority), internal (individual work), and external (collaboration), exhibit traits of both Type 1 and Type 2 styles (Kuan and Zhang 2022). Hongdizi et al (2023) emphasized the need for more empirical research regarding the relationship between thinking style and creativity. Sternberg and Grigorenko (1997) pointed out that thinking style is influenced by an individual's interactions with their environment and can be shaped and developed over time.…”

Is sustainable management education contributing to gender equality?

“…These studies suggest that cognitive styles are organized hierarchically, with dimensions that relate to low-order cognitive processing, higher-order complex cognitive skills, and metacognitive functioning (Kozhevnikov et al, 2014). One important aspect of cognitive styles is that they represent environmentally-sensitive individual differences in cognition, hence developed partly in response to particular contextual characteristics and demands (Dennin et al, 2022;Hongdizi et al, 2023;Newton et al, 2023). As Kozhevnikov et al (2014, p. 25) put it, "different socio-cultural practices and beliefs engender divergent cognitive styles, which may direct a person to foreground an object versus the background, to focus on external versus internal criteria, or to process the global visual image versus its local properties".…”