2022
DOI: 10.17085/apm.21104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of anesthesia type on post-reperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation: a single-center retrospective study

Abstract: Background: Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) results in sudden hemodynamic instability following graft reperfusion. Although PRS is known to influence outcomes following liver transplantation, little is known regarding the effects of anesthetics on PRS. This study investigated the association between the type of anesthetic agent and PRS in liver transplantation. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent liver transplantation between June 2016 and December 2019. Patie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…recently looked at the effect of anesthetic choice (sevoflurane vs. total intravenous anesthesia with propofol) on the incidence of post‐reperfusion syndrome. The sevoflurane group had a lower incidence of PRS than the propofol group, however they found no differences in early‐postoperative outcomes, including length of stay, graft dysfunction, and kidney injury 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…recently looked at the effect of anesthetic choice (sevoflurane vs. total intravenous anesthesia with propofol) on the incidence of post‐reperfusion syndrome. The sevoflurane group had a lower incidence of PRS than the propofol group, however they found no differences in early‐postoperative outcomes, including length of stay, graft dysfunction, and kidney injury 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…5,7 A second database search using the same criteria occurred at a later date and yielded 10 additional studies that met inclusion criteria, making the final number of selected studies 18. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Figure 1 shows a PRISMA diagram detailing the selection process.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations