2020
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of anionic, neutral, and cationic polysaccharides on the in vitro digestibility of raw and gelatinized potato starch

Abstract: BACKGROUND Polysaccharides have been expected to have a suppressive effect on starch digestibility by blending. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of anionic (xanthan gum), neutral (guar gum), and cationic (chitosan) polysaccharides on the in vitro digestibility of raw and gelatinized starch using six potato cultivars differing in phosphorus content. RESULTS By comparing the starch digestibility between potato cultivars, a significant difference was observed for the raw starches, and ‘B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the interaction between starch and non-starchy polysaccharides, the viscosity of starch suspension which complexed with xanthan gum, guar gum, konjac glucomannan, pectin, and chitosan significantly increased ( 85 , 86 ). The increased viscosity of starch suspension in turn retarded enzymes diffusion onto starch surface, leading to a significant reduction in starch digestion extent ( 85 , 86 ).…”
Section: Non-starchy Polysaccharides Slow Starch Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the interaction between starch and non-starchy polysaccharides, the viscosity of starch suspension which complexed with xanthan gum, guar gum, konjac glucomannan, pectin, and chitosan significantly increased ( 85 , 86 ). The increased viscosity of starch suspension in turn retarded enzymes diffusion onto starch surface, leading to a significant reduction in starch digestion extent ( 85 , 86 ).…”
Section: Non-starchy Polysaccharides Slow Starch Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the interaction between starch and non-starchy polysaccharides, the viscosity of starch suspension which complexed with xanthan gum, guar gum, konjac glucomannan, pectin, and chitosan significantly increased ( 85 , 86 ). The increased viscosity of starch suspension in turn retarded enzymes diffusion onto starch surface, leading to a significant reduction in starch digestion extent ( 85 , 86 ). Other soluble fibers including locust bean gum, fenugreek gum, fenugreek gum, and soy soluble polysaccharide also limited enzymes diffusion toward starch molecules and retarded glucose liberated from the starch-polysaccharide systems ( 86 ).…”
Section: Non-starchy Polysaccharides Slow Starch Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polysaccharides containing -COOH or -NH 2 groups reportedly undergo ion complexation to generate the physically crosslinked nanohydrogels with myriad applications as drug delivery vehicles [129]. Typically, the anionic polysaccharides generate hydrogels by interacting with metal cations, while the cationic polyglucosamines interact with multivalent metal anions [130][131]. Similarly, the negatively charged alginic acid displays cross-linking interactions with CaCl 2 , whereas the positively charged chitosan readily interacts with sodium tri-polyphosphate [132][133][134].…”
Section: Physical Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 In fact, results with different polysaccharides (guar gum and chitosan) indicated a negative correlation between the peak viscosity (11 814-14 535 mPa s) and the SDS fraction of potato starches, suggesting that the effect might be more related to physical properties than chemical interactions. 10 Nevertheless, very limited studies have correlated the viscosity of starch gels with the digestion parameters. For instance, a higher peak viscosity (480-5076 mPa s) and viscosity breakdown, defined as the difference between the peak viscosity and the lowest viscosity of potato starches during the holding stage at 95 °C (24-3540 mPa s), were correlated with lower hydrolysis rates of native starches but that correlation was not observed with gelatinized starches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%