(18,19,21,24). Its basic assumption is that osmotically derived hydrostatic pressure causes tension within the plane of the wall. The wall is not uniformly rigid, and so expansion occurs at regions that are most plastic. Conceptually, growth should be especially problematic for gramnegative bacteria, in which the load-bearing peptidoglycan of the cell wall is extremely thin (19,23) and the bonds within it are stressed greatly by the cell's high (3 to 5 atm) internal osmotic pressure (20,21). In the case of gram-negative enteric bacteria, the prevailing form of the surface stress theory is the variable T model, which suggests that cell shape is determined by regional variation of T, the analog of surface tension (23). Although new murein is inserted all over the surface of gram-negative rods (30), localized variations in T lead to regional differences in the bond stresses within the sacculus, which in turn dictate the rate of cell wall growth. Growth is slow where T is high (at the old poles and on the side walls) and is faster where T is lower (at the developing division sites).This study illustrates that bacteria curve as they grow in applied electric fields. Our data suggest that this striking morphology arises from field-induced regional variation in wall growth rates on the anode-and cathode-facing sides of cells. The ability to manipulate T locally may therefore be a valuable tool in the effort to understand the process of normal growth. Our data also imply that the mechanism for galvanotropism is not the same for all cell types. Specifically, actin is not an 702