2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15803-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of aquifer heterogeneity on Cr(VI) diffusion and removal from groundwater

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cr content has dramatically increased in recent years, for example, 6–12 ppb in the Godavari River in 2014 [ 4 ] and 10.5–113 ppb in the Yangtze River in 2009 [ 5 ] have been reported. The consistent diffusion of Cr(VI) into groundwater was also detected [ 6 ]. Undoubtedly, Cr species would have a great influence on the drinking-water quality and public health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Cr content has dramatically increased in recent years, for example, 6–12 ppb in the Godavari River in 2014 [ 4 ] and 10.5–113 ppb in the Yangtze River in 2009 [ 5 ] have been reported. The consistent diffusion of Cr(VI) into groundwater was also detected [ 6 ]. Undoubtedly, Cr species would have a great influence on the drinking-water quality and public health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hexavalent chromium [Cr­(VI)] is one of the most commonly detected metal contaminants in groundwater. , Approximately 11% of the polluted sites on the U.S. National Priorities List are contaminated by Cr­(VI), and persistence of Cr­(VI) contamination at concentrations above the maximum contaminant level (MCL) is common, even after decades of remediation. ,, Cost-effective management of long-term contamination of groundwater at low concentrations is particularly challenging. Most of the remedial technologies designed for fast removal of Cr­(VI) (e.g., in situ precipitation or chemical reduction) are less efficient for lasting large plumes of low contaminant concentrations. Permeable reactive barriers have been used, and yet the loss of permeability due to biofouling or mineral precipitation limits their applicability. , Currently, pump and treat is still the most commonly used approach in dealing with low-level residual Cr­(VI) at many contaminated sites, but the generation of large quantities of wastewater and the long-term operating costs hinder its feasibility. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%