The present work aimed to determine some of the influences of the treatments with glutathione (GSH), ascorbic acid (AA), catechinic tannin (T) and carbon dioxide (CO 2) during winemaking or bottling on the volatile profiles of white wines of Feteasca Regala. The study is based on the use of a flash gas chromatography electronic nose, which is able to discriminate various clusters of wine samples prepared with various combinations of antioxidants. The treatments that induce enough differences in the volatile profiles of the wine that the electronic nose is able to discriminate are likely to be discriminated also by the consumers. When the electronic nose does not discriminate the clusters of samples with certain treatments it is very likely that those treatments are not sufficient to induce a practically important difference in the aromatic profile of wines. The main detectable influences of the antioxidant treatments are presented and discussed. The treatment of musts with AA (50 mg/l) clearly influences the volatile profile of the wines, reducing their aromatic complexity. The treatment during bottling with catechinic tannin (20 mg/l) does not seem to have an important influence of the profile of the wines produced with the addition of AA and or GSH. The addition of carbon dioxide during bottling does not show much influence one year after bottling, but it shows that in the samples most prone to oxidation, a difference is present. The CO 2 treated wines belonging to the cluster of wines treated with 40 mg/l GSH and 50 mg/l AA have distinct profiles, different from those not protected and closer to the clusters of the less oxidised wines. The treatment of musts with GSH shows clear influences at the dose of 40 mg/l, but for the lower dose of 20 mg/l GSH in Feteasca regala wines it is difficult to identify differences compared to the wines included in the cluster of samples not treated with GSH. This finding is particularly relevant as the dose of 20 mg/l GSH is the maximum allowed at present to be added in must and wines. Cluster Sub-cluster Sample code Color in name name figures G0 G0T0 G00 A00 T00 (r1-r3) Light G00 A00 T00 CO2 (r1-r3) blue G0T20 G00 A00 T20 (r1-r3) Dark G00 A00 T20 CO2 (r1-r3) blue G20 G20 G20 A00 T00 (r1-r3) Light G20 A00 T00 CO2 (r1-r3) green G20T20 G20 A00 T20 (r1-r3) Dark G20 A00 T20 CO2 (r1-r3) green G20A G20AT0 G20 A50 T00 (r1-r3) Light G20 A50 T00 CO2 (r1-r3) orange G20AT20 G20 A50 T20 (r1-r3) Dark G20 A50 T20 CO2 (r1-r3) orange G40 G40T0 G40 A00 T00 (r1-r3) Light G40 A00 T00 CO2 (r1-r3) cyan G40T20 G40 A00 T20 (r1-r3) Dark G40 A00 T20 CO2 (r1-r3) cyan G40A G40AT0 G40 A50 T00 (r1-r3) Light G40 A50 T00 CO2 (r1-r3) magenta G40AT20 G40 A50 T20 (r1-r3) Dark G40 A50 T20 CO2 (r1-r3) magenta