2001
DOI: 10.1080/01431160151144332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of atmospheric correction on the estimation of biophysical parameters of crop canopy using satellite remote sensing

Abstract: A quantitative approach has been made for the estimation of biophysical parameters of a vegetation canopy by the inversion of a vegetation canopy re¯ectance model. Model inversion has been done using a non-linear optimization scheme against directional re¯ectance data over the canopy. A quasi-Newton algorithm has been employed that searches the minimum of a function iteratively using the functional values only. The technique provides a reasonably good estimation of the biophysical parameters. A study has been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For many applications, especially multi-temporal analyses, raw relative pixel values or digital image numbers have to be corrected for atmospheric effects and converted to spectral reflectance at the surface before the images are processed [35]. Improper atmospheric correction can lead to significant errors in the retrieved reflectance and affect the accuracy of the estimates [36]. Several atmospheric correction models have been developed, including the Simplified Model for Atmospheric Correction (SMAC [37]), Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum (6S [38]), Moderate-Resolution Atmospheric Transmittance and Radiance Code (MODTRAN [39]), ATmospheric CORrection (ATCOR [40]), Dark Object Subtraction (DOS [41]), and COSine Transmission for atmospheric correction (COST [42]).…”
Section: Modis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many applications, especially multi-temporal analyses, raw relative pixel values or digital image numbers have to be corrected for atmospheric effects and converted to spectral reflectance at the surface before the images are processed [35]. Improper atmospheric correction can lead to significant errors in the retrieved reflectance and affect the accuracy of the estimates [36]. Several atmospheric correction models have been developed, including the Simplified Model for Atmospheric Correction (SMAC [37]), Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum (6S [38]), Moderate-Resolution Atmospheric Transmittance and Radiance Code (MODTRAN [39]), ATmospheric CORrection (ATCOR [40]), Dark Object Subtraction (DOS [41]), and COSine Transmission for atmospheric correction (COST [42]).…”
Section: Modis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolving condition of a landscape with surface components consisting of primary surface classes e.g., soil, vegetation and water is principally dependent on the dynamic changes of surface variables that result in modification in their radiative response properties. In such deterministic processes of surface radiative responses, vegetation phenology, land physiography and condition, amount of incident solar radiation, dynamic soil moisture condition plays important role (S. Rahman, 2007, Rahman 2001). The role of overspreading water has a dual role to play in this regard.…”
Section: Y Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meyer et al 1993, Richter 1996, Richter et al 2006, Schroeder et al 2007), but few of them quantify the effects of some of these corrections on the change-detection results (e.g. Rahman 2001, Paolini et al 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%