2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09372-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of base fluid, temperature, and concentration on the thermophysical properties of hybrid nanofluids of alumina–ferrofluid: experimental data, modeling through enhanced ANN, ANFIS, and curve fitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
46
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is well illustrated in Figure 7 , in which the electrical conductivity was improved linearly as the temperature increased. Consequently, the electrical conductivity of the nanofluids was directly proportional to the volume concentration and temperature, which was consistent with earlier studies reported in the literature for mono-particle and hybrid nanofluids [ 14 , 38 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. At 55 °C and 1.5 vol%, maximum electrical conductivity (4139 μS/cm) was obtained which was considerably higher than the values of 19.0 μS/cm (for Fe 3 O 4 /water nanofluid at 0.6 vol% and 60 °C) and 1127–1265 μS/cm (Al 2 O 3 -MWCNT (80:20)/DIW nanofluid at 0.1 vol% and 50 °C) reported by Bagheli et al [ 49 ] and Giwa et al [ 38 ], respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This observation is well illustrated in Figure 7 , in which the electrical conductivity was improved linearly as the temperature increased. Consequently, the electrical conductivity of the nanofluids was directly proportional to the volume concentration and temperature, which was consistent with earlier studies reported in the literature for mono-particle and hybrid nanofluids [ 14 , 38 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. At 55 °C and 1.5 vol%, maximum electrical conductivity (4139 μS/cm) was obtained which was considerably higher than the values of 19.0 μS/cm (for Fe 3 O 4 /water nanofluid at 0.6 vol% and 60 °C) and 1127–1265 μS/cm (Al 2 O 3 -MWCNT (80:20)/DIW nanofluid at 0.1 vol% and 50 °C) reported by Bagheli et al [ 49 ] and Giwa et al [ 38 ], respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Experimental methods have been devised to check the stability of NF and HNF. These include sedimentation, centrifugation, spectral absorbency, viscosity, electron microscopy, ZP, poly-disparity index and light scattering [ 10 , 27 , 34 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. In studies involving CHT in enclosures, the sedimentation, centrifugation, spectral absorbency, viscosity, density, ZP and poly-disparity index are mostly engaged to check the stability of NF and HNF [ 15 , 16 , 36 , 49 , 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Formulation and Stability Of Mono-particle And Hybrid Nanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to prepare NF, and they reported various degrees of enhancements under diverse ranges of temperatures and volume/mass fractions or concentrations. The literature revealed the enhancement of TC of NF in comparison with the respective base fluids as the temperature and volume/mass fraction or concentration increased [ 12 , 48 , 59 , 80 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 ]. The influence of magnetic field on the TC of NF has been investigated by a few researchers [ 91 , 92 , 93 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 ].…”
Section: Thermophysical Properties Of Nanofluids and Hybrid-nanoflmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations