“…Among these factors, it has been shown that a considerable amount (approximately up to half of the variance) of the interindividual heterogeneity in physical outcomes (Bouchard and Rankinen, 2001; Timmons et al, 2010; Davidsen et al, 2011; Timmons, 2011; Bouchard, 2012; Wilson et al, 2019), cognitive outcomes (McClearn, 1997; Goldberg and Weinberger, 2004; Blokland et al, 2008; Erickson et al, 2008; Friedman et al, 2008; Canivet et al, 2015, 2017), and brain structure outcomes (Thompson et al, 2001; Toga and Thompson, 2005; Bueller et al, 2006) are explained by genetics. However, considering current evidence, lifestyle factors may equalize a “genetic handicap” since people with a high CRF level but “unfavorable” genetic polymorphisms do not need to perform significantly poorer than individuals with low CRF level but “favorable” genetic equipment (Brown et al, 2019). These findings suggest that a genetic handicap can be counteracted by other factors (Flück, 2018) and that “overemphasizing” genetics for the individualization of exercise prescriptions is counter-productive (Carlsten and Burke, 2006; Kohane, 2009; Horwitz et al, 2013; Joyner and Lundby, 2018; Peck, 2018; Joyner, 2019).…”