2005
DOI: 10.1080/00221680509500119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of bed roughness on sediment suspension: experimental and theoretical studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At medium velocity (101 cm/s), the log-skew-Laplace distribution appears to give the best-fit for bedload sediments among the three distributions. When the flow velocity was reduced to 68 cm/s, the grain size showed a log-normal distribution, whereas at an increased velocity (116 cm/s) the bedload sediments approached to reflect the identical distribution as the beds (Mazumder et al, 2005b) although the log-skewLaplace distribution was the best-fit one. It could therefore be deduced that, at both an intermediate and a relatively high velocity, the log-skewLaplace was the best-fit irrespective of the bed roughness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At medium velocity (101 cm/s), the log-skew-Laplace distribution appears to give the best-fit for bedload sediments among the three distributions. When the flow velocity was reduced to 68 cm/s, the grain size showed a log-normal distribution, whereas at an increased velocity (116 cm/s) the bedload sediments approached to reflect the identical distribution as the beds (Mazumder et al, 2005b) although the log-skewLaplace distribution was the best-fit one. It could therefore be deduced that, at both an intermediate and a relatively high velocity, the log-skewLaplace was the best-fit irrespective of the bed roughness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…10C1-10C5) with known grain-size distributions; these beds consisted of heterogeneous mixtures of particles ranging from 0.032 to 8 mm (Mazumder et al, 2005b), with different values of bed roughness. The roughness values of the various sediment beds were computed for the experiments based on the measure of D 65 (the sieve size for which 65% of the mixture by weight is finer).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations