2019
DOI: 10.1111/sms.13524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of between‐limb asymmetry in muscle mass, strength, and power on functional capacity in healthy older adults

Abstract: Purpose Numerous daily tasks such as walking and rising from a chair involve bilateral lower limb movements. During such tasks, lower extremity function (LEF) may be compromised among older adults. LEF may be further impaired due to high degrees of between‐limb asymmetry. The present study investigated the prevalence of between‐limb asymmetry in muscle mass, strength, and power in a cohort of healthy older adults and examined the influence of between‐limb asymmetry on LEF. Methods Two hundred and eight healthy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The test was performed in a Kinetic Communicator (Kin‐Com, model 500‐11, Kinetic Communicator, Chattecx, Chattanooga, TN), as described previously by Aagaard et al (2001) . The test‐protocol followed standard routines in our lab (for detailed description see Mertz et al). Strong verbal encouragement was provided before and during each contraction and visual feedback were given in terms of force curves displaying the best attempt together with the latest attempt on a computer screen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test was performed in a Kinetic Communicator (Kin‐Com, model 500‐11, Kinetic Communicator, Chattecx, Chattanooga, TN), as described previously by Aagaard et al (2001) . The test‐protocol followed standard routines in our lab (for detailed description see Mertz et al). Strong verbal encouragement was provided before and during each contraction and visual feedback were given in terms of force curves displaying the best attempt together with the latest attempt on a computer screen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional capacities of the participants were assessed by applied functional measures and strength measures. Detailed methods for these measurements can be found elsewhere [ 43 , 50 ]. The strength measures included: the dominant hand grip strength using a grip strength dynamometer (DHD-1 (SH1001); SAEHAN Corporation, Changwon City, Korea), Maximal Voluntary isometric Contraction (MVC) of the dominant m. quadricep muscle strength, measured at 70-degree flexion in a Kinetic Communicator (model 500-11, Kinetic Communicator; Isokinetic International, Chattanooga, TN, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional capacities of the participants were assessed by applied functional measures and strength measures. Detailed methods for these measurements can be found elsewhere [43,50]…”
Section: Muscle Strength and Functional Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the control group, a significant side-to-side difference was found for the hip adduction with an average deficit of 0.1 N m/kg (8%) on the non-dominant side. Side-to-side strength imbalances of the lower extremities have been reported to not only exist for injured athletes but also in asymptomatic healthy individuals [38][39][40]. The side differences of strength might differ for each joint and functional task as well as might be influenced by age [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%