2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Bidirectional Near-Fault Excitations on RC Bridge Piers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the ultimate ductility is considerably lower in columns under bidirectional loading and this effect is more prominent in rectangular columns (50% to 75% lower in the weak direction and approximately 35% lower in the strong direction). Similarly, in a numerical study, Sengupta et al [30], found that bidirectional loading can amplify the response in the short period systems up to 30% for ground motions records with forward directivity characteristics and as high as 50% for stiff systems under fling pulses ground motions.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the ultimate ductility is considerably lower in columns under bidirectional loading and this effect is more prominent in rectangular columns (50% to 75% lower in the weak direction and approximately 35% lower in the strong direction). Similarly, in a numerical study, Sengupta et al [30], found that bidirectional loading can amplify the response in the short period systems up to 30% for ground motions records with forward directivity characteristics and as high as 50% for stiff systems under fling pulses ground motions.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, all the above-mentioned studies used 2D structural models excited under unidirectional loading, which is in contradiction with the bidirectional nature of ground motions and 3D geometry of buildings. The bidirectional load interaction leads to increased elongation of the structural period and pronounced increase in bond-slip and shear displacement [30] which is more severe for short-period structures. Damage accumulation under mainshock and aftershock can be increased significantly under bidirectional loading in particular for stiff systems.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,18 As Kalker's linear creep theory is only appropriate for small shrimps, nonlinear modifications were carried out for large shrimps with Shen-Hedrick-Elkins Model. 13,19 A simplified interactive approach is introduced here for the nonlinear seismic study of the LRVRCV system, and equation ( 4) is rewritten as equation (5). P rb and P rv can be substituted by the normal and tangential direction wheel-rail relationships.…”
Section: Vehicle-bridge Coupled System Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Many experiments on NF earthquakes' influences on bridges indicate the elastic and plastic responses in NF earthquakes from pillars with less hysteretic loops and more significant envelopes of energy. [5][6][7][8][9] The pier-top changes triggered by NF earthquakes are at a design stage of simple earthquakes 30 percent higher than those induced by FFGM. 10 Even with moderate seismic intensities, bridge-crossing events' safety can be compromised by small displacements for railway bridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of bidirectional shaking is accounted for by using a simplified 30% rule. Bidirectional interaction under near-fault motion is observed to substantially amplify damage, particularly for a stiff system [12]. Sehhati et al studied the effect of near-fault ground motions on the multi-story structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%