2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01959.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Biopolymer Emulsifier Type on Formation and Stability of Rice Bran Oil‐in‐Water Emulsions: Whey Protein, Gum Arabic, and Modified Starch

Abstract: Rice bran oil (RBO) is used in foods, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals due to its desirable health, flavor, and functional attributes. We investigated the effects of biopolymer emulsifier type and environmental stresses on the stability of RBO emulsions. Oil-in-water emulsions (5% RBO, 10 mM citrate buffer) stabilized by whey protein isolate (WPI), gum arabic (GA), or modified starch (MS) were prepared using high-pressure homogenization. The new MS used had a higher number of octenyl succinic anhydride (OSA) gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
87
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
87
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the droplets have a high negative charge is important for certain applications, since it affects the physical and chemical stability of emulsions (Karraker and Radke 2002;McClements 2005). The CPRBO emulsions stabilized by GMS had larger negative zeta potential than RBO emulsions stabilized by whey protein, gum Arabic, or modified starch (Charoen et al 2011) or by Tween 80 and Span 80 (Nguyen et al 2013). This may have been due to differences in the type of ionized species adsorbed at the oil-water interface, or due to differences in solution properties (such as pH and ionic strength).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the droplets have a high negative charge is important for certain applications, since it affects the physical and chemical stability of emulsions (Karraker and Radke 2002;McClements 2005). The CPRBO emulsions stabilized by GMS had larger negative zeta potential than RBO emulsions stabilized by whey protein, gum Arabic, or modified starch (Charoen et al 2011) or by Tween 80 and Span 80 (Nguyen et al 2013). This may have been due to differences in the type of ionized species adsorbed at the oil-water interface, or due to differences in solution properties (such as pH and ionic strength).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, polysaccharide-stabilized emulsions tend to be relatively stable to changes in pH (Figure 4), ionic strength, and temperature [22,23,39,46]. Nevertheless, many polysaccharides have some electrical charge, which may impact their ability to interact with other charged substances, such as transition metals, colloidal particles, or biopolymers.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Natural Emulsifiersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It consists mainly of a mixture of arabinogalactan (AG) (80-90 % of the total gum in weight), glycoprotein (GP) (2-4 % of the total gum in weight) and arabinogalactan protein (AGP) (10-20 % of the total gum in weight) fractions (Bouyer et al 2011). Previous studies showed that gum arabic was widely used in preparation of emulsions, and the droplet characteristics were then evaluated (Jayme et al 1999;Djordjevic et al 2007Djordjevic et al , 2008Karaiskou et al 2008;Padala et al 2009;Bouyer et al 2011;Charoen et al 2011;Zhang and Liu 2011). However, no information is available concerning the effect of antioxidants on the stability of β-carotene in the emulsions stabilized by gum arabic.…”
Section: Effects Of Antioxidants On the Droplet Characteristics Of β-mentioning
confidence: 99%