2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02762009000700016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of blood meal and mating in reproduction patterns of Triatoma brasiliensis females (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) under laboratory conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To maintain vigilance, it is necessary to focus on secondary vectors, including T. juazeirensis and T. sherlocki. Evaluation of their potential as vectors includes numerous biological parameters, especially the capacity to reproduce (brasileiro 1984; Costa et al 1986;lima et al 1987;marassá et al 1998;Daflon-teixeira et al 2009). In this study, the data clearly demonstrate that T. juazeirensis has a greater reproductive capacity to propagate than T. sherlocki.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To maintain vigilance, it is necessary to focus on secondary vectors, including T. juazeirensis and T. sherlocki. Evaluation of their potential as vectors includes numerous biological parameters, especially the capacity to reproduce (brasileiro 1984; Costa et al 1986;lima et al 1987;marassá et al 1998;Daflon-teixeira et al 2009). In this study, the data clearly demonstrate that T. juazeirensis has a greater reproductive capacity to propagate than T. sherlocki.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…(Daflon-teixeira et al 2009), but lower than T. brasiliensis (142) (soares et al 2000) and Triatoma rubrofasciata (De Geer) (242.9) (braGa et al 1998), fed on mice (M. musculus). The difference in egg laying by T. brasiliensis displayed a difference based on the food source highlighting the influence exerted by feeding on the fertility and fecundity (Costa et al 1986, Guarneri et al 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations