2016
DOI: 10.4103/1012-5574.175854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of BMI and head circumference on variables of auditory evoked potential in young healthy male human participants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[9] Aoyagi et al stated the same with absolute latency III, V, I-III, and I-V. [11] Fukaya and Hosoya reported positive correlations between the head size and absolute latencies of wave III, V and the I-V IPL. [24] In yet another study by Ghugare et al, head size was found to be significantly correlated with wave V and interpeak I-V and III-V. [25] The influence of the head size on BAEP latencies was further reinforced in the present study by the findings obtained after comparison between the two groups with different head sizes (Table 3). Furthermore, the gender differences in absolute BAEP latencies obtained in our study were studied again in males and females with comparable head sizes and the differences were then found to turn non-significant statistically ( Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[9] Aoyagi et al stated the same with absolute latency III, V, I-III, and I-V. [11] Fukaya and Hosoya reported positive correlations between the head size and absolute latencies of wave III, V and the I-V IPL. [24] In yet another study by Ghugare et al, head size was found to be significantly correlated with wave V and interpeak I-V and III-V. [25] The influence of the head size on BAEP latencies was further reinforced in the present study by the findings obtained after comparison between the two groups with different head sizes (Table 3). Furthermore, the gender differences in absolute BAEP latencies obtained in our study were studied again in males and females with comparable head sizes and the differences were then found to turn non-significant statistically ( Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…[15,16] In addition, a significant positive correlation of head size and all the three absolute latencies tested (I, III, and V) and IPL I-V was evident when studied in males and females separately and in the total study group as well, which comply with other similar studies ( Table 2). [9,11,17,25] Among these studies, Dempsey et al obtained a positive correlation with wave V and I-V IPL. [9] Aoyagi et al stated the same with absolute latency III, V, I-III, and I-V. [11] Fukaya and Hosoya reported positive correlations between the head size and absolute latencies of wave III, V and the I-V IPL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean amplitude ratio between wave V and I was not consistent with findings in adults by Gathe et al 19 and Ghugare et al 20 , but the difference between right and left ear was also reported in control group by Thakur et al 21 .…”
Section: V/i Ratiocontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Inter study variations documented within side the BAER values may be attributed to variable cohort and sample sizes in distinctive different study populations from distinctive different geographical areas 20 .…”
Section: V/i Ratiomentioning
confidence: 98%