2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of boron isotope ratio on the thermal conductivity of uranium diboride (UB2) and zirconium diboride (ZrB2)

Abstract: Influence of boron isotope ratio on the thermal conductivity of uranium diboride (UB2) and zirconium diboride (ZrB2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, it was noted that point defects in alloys such as HEAs cannot be represented by a single formation energy [ 9 , 116 ], rather because of the variation in the local coordination and symmetry considerations, a range of energies for vacancies, interstitials and substitutional defects result in a range of solution, Schottky, Frenkel and anti-site energies. In addition to point defect computations, DFT calculations that involve the computation of phonons (e.g., to predict thermal properties such as thermal expansion) are more complicated in HEAs [ 167 ] compared to simpler systems due to the symmetry considerations that can be exploited in simple systems that vastly reduce the computational expense of methods such as the quasi-harmonic and harmonic approximations (e.g., Reference [ 168 ], which also captures electronic effects related to thermal and phonon properties). Other methods can be used instead (including molecular dynamics methods [ 169 , 170 ]), but these are not necessarily more computationally efficient or robust when combined with DFT, providing a significant hurdle to modelling HEAs.…”
Section: Challenges and Opportunities For Hea Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, it was noted that point defects in alloys such as HEAs cannot be represented by a single formation energy [ 9 , 116 ], rather because of the variation in the local coordination and symmetry considerations, a range of energies for vacancies, interstitials and substitutional defects result in a range of solution, Schottky, Frenkel and anti-site energies. In addition to point defect computations, DFT calculations that involve the computation of phonons (e.g., to predict thermal properties such as thermal expansion) are more complicated in HEAs [ 167 ] compared to simpler systems due to the symmetry considerations that can be exploited in simple systems that vastly reduce the computational expense of methods such as the quasi-harmonic and harmonic approximations (e.g., Reference [ 168 ], which also captures electronic effects related to thermal and phonon properties). Other methods can be used instead (including molecular dynamics methods [ 169 , 170 ]), but these are not necessarily more computationally efficient or robust when combined with DFT, providing a significant hurdle to modelling HEAs.…”
Section: Challenges and Opportunities For Hea Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultra‐high temperature ceramics (UHTCs) are candidate materials for use in extreme environments such as those demanded by next generation hypersonic flight vehicles and nuclear reactors 1,2 . UHTCs are defined by melting temperatures exceeding 3273 K and are generally comprised of borides, carbides, and nitrides of the transition metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultra-high temperature ceramics (UHTCs) are candidate materials for use in extreme environments such as those demanded by next generation hypersonic flight vehicles and nuclear reactors. 1,2 UHTCs are defined by melting temperatures exceeding 3273 K and are generally comprised of borides, carbides, and nitrides of the transition metals. In particular, ZrB 2 -based ceramics are of interest due to their high thermal conductivity (up to ~140 W/m K) 3 , strength at elevated temperatures (675 MPa at 1873 K) 4 , and melting temperature (3523 K).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UB 2 has a higher uranium density compared to uranium dioxide (11.68 g cm −3 and 9.67 g cm −3 , respectively [1]), similar to other accident tolerant fuels/advanced technology candidate fuels (ATFs) such as U 3 Si 2 (11.31 g cm −3 [2]). UB 2 also has a much higher thermal conductivity compared to UO 2 [3,4], which will result in a lower fuel centre-line temperatures during normal operating conditions and a significantly flatter temperature profile across the pellet. This has a number of beneficial effects: (1) reducing the rate of the temperature-dependent release of fission products, (2) reduction in the pellet strain as a result of thermal expansion (which is similar to that of UO 2 ), (3) a reduction in the amount of thermal energy stored inside the fuel and importantly (4) a significant increase in the margin to centre-line melting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%