2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cavosurface angle on the stress concentration and gaps formation in class V resin composite restorations

Abstract: The study aimed to evaluate the influence of cavosurface angle on stress concentration and gap formation in class V restorations. Cylindrical cavities 3 mm in diameter were prepared in forty-five bovine incisors, changing only the angle of the bur in relation to the flat surface of the tooth. The cavities maintained the same volume (17.67 mm³). The samples were divided according to the cavosurface angle, into three groups (n=15): 90º, 120º, 135º. After adhesive application (Futurabond U, VOCO), the cavity was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the stress reduction at the root may be due to the loss of contact between the root and the bone tissue due to the defect of preapical bone, which naturally leads to a decrease in root stress. What’s more, this change in stress can lead to a polarization of stresses within the tooth and finally have an extremely destructive effect on the residual dental hard tissue [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the stress reduction at the root may be due to the loss of contact between the root and the bone tissue due to the defect of preapical bone, which naturally leads to a decrease in root stress. What’s more, this change in stress can lead to a polarization of stresses within the tooth and finally have an extremely destructive effect on the residual dental hard tissue [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 On contrary to our result, several authors reported that using this technique for composite application leads to an increase in the Cfactor, and thereupon increases the shrinkage stresses between the opposing cavity walls which lead to microleakage. 45,46 The next best result of microleakage distribution was the oblique technique (GpIII) (Figure 4). Our results were in agreement with Lopes et al, 47 and Loguercio et al, 48 who documented that the combined simultaneous different layers using the oblique placement technique may result in much more shrinkage stress and microleakage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the extension of NCCLs, previous studies showed that some cavity con gurations might favor stress concentration at the bonded interface more than others [17,[19][20], which could contribute to premature failure of the resin composite restorations. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis [21] pointed out that the cavity extension did not in uence the retention of resin composite restoration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%