2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cerium doping concentration on the optical properties of Ce,Mg:LuAG scintillation ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible route could be the use of proper co‐dopants or the investigation of the role of Ce concentration. In fact, a recent study on annealed LuAG:Ce,Mg ceramics reported that the 280 °C TSL peak intensity (observed in this case around 250 °C) depends on Ce concentration in a way that cannot be explained only with a different efficiency of the luminescence center …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A possible route could be the use of proper co‐dopants or the investigation of the role of Ce concentration. In fact, a recent study on annealed LuAG:Ce,Mg ceramics reported that the 280 °C TSL peak intensity (observed in this case around 250 °C) depends on Ce concentration in a way that cannot be explained only with a different efficiency of the luminescence center …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Several examples of these ions activating scintillation properties can be seen in reference. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Besides, Ce 3+ and Pr 3+ are considered as the most appropriate doping ions, because the scintillation emission peaks of these two ions are located in the visible band, which can produce efficient luminescence with nearly free of self-absorption. 8 Many studies on cerium-doped BaF 2 crystal have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rare‐earth family, Ce 3+ , Pr 3+ , Eu 2+ , and Yb 3+ are well‐known to researchers for the 5 d –4 f transition, which allowed by electric‐dipole, and are very fast, with lifetimes of the order of dozens of nanoseconds. Several examples of these ions activating scintillation properties can be seen in reference 15–20 . Besides, Ce 3+ and Pr 3+ are considered as the most appropriate doping ions, because the scintillation emission peaks of these two ions are located in the visible band, which can produce efficient luminescence with nearly free of self‐absorption 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, as the requirements for scintillation properties in medical imaging and high energy physics (HEP) experiments have become more stringent, a variety of scintillation materials have been developed. Among them, lutetium aluminum garnet with cerium as the luminescence center (LuAG:Ce) is one of the most promising scintillators due to its excellent scintillation performance 3‐5 . However, the low light yield value and the large slow components contamination in the scintillation response have greatly limited the practical application of LuAG:Ce 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with cerium as the luminescence center (LuAG:Ce) is one of the most promising scintillators due to its excellent scintillation performance. [3][4][5] However, the low light yield value and the large slow components contamination in the scintillation response have greatly limited the practical application of LuAG:Ce. 6 As is widely known, a scintillation process can be simply described in terms of the following three stages: Energy conversion, carrier transport, and luminescence, where the carriers transport stage is sensitive to various intrinsic defects and impurities in the host lattice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%