1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02520005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of changing peripheral geometry on electrical impedance tomography measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two regions appear as one in these images, although other reconstruction algorithms have resolved two lungs under similar test conditions, as did the D-bar algorithm on the experimental tank data in Isaacson et al 2004. The probable cause for this distortion is modeling the chest by a disc. It is well known that such an approximation can cause artifacts; see Adler et al 1996, Gersing et al 1996, Kolehmainen et al 1997, Kolehmainen et al 2005 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two regions appear as one in these images, although other reconstruction algorithms have resolved two lungs under similar test conditions, as did the D-bar algorithm on the experimental tank data in Isaacson et al 2004. The probable cause for this distortion is modeling the chest by a disc. It is well known that such an approximation can cause artifacts; see Adler et al 1996, Gersing et al 1996, Kolehmainen et al 1997, Kolehmainen et al 2005 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus a direct inversion of (3.6) is unsuitable. This explains the observation that a slightly incorrect boundary can lead to erroneous recoveries [1,24]. This issue can be resolved by mfEIT.…”
Section: Imperfectly Known Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For demonstrations of the domain model related reconstruction artifacts with practical EIT measurements, see e.g. [12,24,28].…”
Section: Shape-deforming Reconstruction: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the shape of the chest may change slightly because of breathing and changes in the patient position, and therefore, the knowledge on the shape of the chest would be approximate even at the most optimal scenario. This situation is problematic since even small errors in the domain model can origin large artifacts in the reconstructed conductivity images [1,12,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%