1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(96)00325-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of characterised natural organic material on activated carbon adsorption: II. Effect on pore volume distribution and adsorption of 2-methylisoborneol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
98
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
98
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of 1.67 g l -1 PAC significantly reduced the high MW organics in the reactor, however, the further addition of another 1.67 g l -1 PAC did not reduce the amount of remaining high MW compounds any further. This might be because the remaining non-adsorptive substances have a low affinity for PAC, or that the carbon surface has been modified due to the adsorption of organics [20,21].…”
Section: Smp Production During Start-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of 1.67 g l -1 PAC significantly reduced the high MW organics in the reactor, however, the further addition of another 1.67 g l -1 PAC did not reduce the amount of remaining high MW compounds any further. This might be because the remaining non-adsorptive substances have a low affinity for PAC, or that the carbon surface has been modified due to the adsorption of organics [20,21].…”
Section: Smp Production During Start-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high anity of non-adsorptive humic substances for UF membrane as in the case of PAC-pretreatment as well as the potentially modi®ed carbon surface characteristics resulting from adsorption of organic matter (Newcombe et al, 1997b) may be partially responsible for the observed phenomenon. Further, DOC removal data in Fig.…”
Section: Eect Of Humic Substance Hydrophobicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozone oxidation and biodegradation by biological activated carbon have been considered to be two effective methods for mitigation of the odor problem (Newcombe et al, 1997;Geering, 1999;Cook et al, 2001;von Gunten, 2003a) The combination of ozonation and biological activated carbon (BAC) (O 3 -BAC), which integrates the oxidation effect of O 3 and the biological degradation effect of BAC, have often been adopted as an advanced water treatment approach because of its capability in comprehensively improving drinking water quality (Newcombe and Cook, 2002). Though the O 3 -BAC process has been proved to be effective in the removal of odors (Cook et al, 2001;Newcombe and Cook, 2002), most of the previous studies have mainly been limited to the earthy odorants including 2-MIB and geosmin (Srinivasan and Sorial, 2011;Antonopoulou et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%