The capacity of clay minerals to store large amounts
of water is
utilized in a number of industrial and environmental applications
on Earth, for example, as components in geosynthetic clay liners in
landfills or ingredients in water-based drilling fluids, and could
prove important on Mars to identify future human landing sites where
water could be harvested. The subzero behavior of water interacting
within the interlayer space of clay minerals is of particular interest
in most applications but remains poorly understood. To better understand
the hydrothermal mechanism by which water ice bonds and separates
from clay interlayers, we have utilized neutron spectroscopy, spectral
analysis, and phonon band assignment. The inelastic neutron scattering
from sodium montmorillonite, hydrated at 24, 73, and 166% water content,
as well as an oven-dried sample, were measured to assess the vibrational
density of states. The water contents studied provide a range of pore
dimensions within clay gels that have varying degrees of confinement.
The type of ice formed from water held in larger intra- and interparticle
pores differs substantially from that confined within the interlayer
(pseudo-two-layer hydrate), and the differences vary with hydration
level. Spectral subtraction over an energy transfer range 50 < E < 550 cm–1 (8 < E < 70 meV) produces clearly two different forms of ice: hexagonal
and cubic in the two wetter samples. A form of interfacial ice, presumably
of a lower density, is observed in the vibrational density of states
spectrum of the sample hydrated to a pseudo-two-layer hydrate (ie
24% gravimetric water content (GWC), 10 H2O/Na+). No hexagonal or cubic ice is observed in this sample. The four
vibrational modes within the translation band of hexagonal ice are
apparent within the sample hydrated to 166% gravimetric water content,
in which pores greater than 20 nm are largely water-filled. By considering
hydrogen bonding of the water to the clay surface, our data indicate
an increase in the strength of the H-bond due to a shorter distance
to the hydroxyl. We attribute this decrease to the pores in the clay
generating a localized negative pressure or “suction”
effect, thus attracting the water.